Economic impact of cross compliance in the field of animal welfare (Acts C18 and C16)

The paper reports the results of assessment of animal welfare at farm level on two dairy cattle farms, identification of structural and management actions to improve the animal welfare and estimate of the costs of such actions; furthermore the economic impact of the potential support under measure 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marisanna Speroni, Maurizio Capelletti, Antonio Bruni, Luigi Degano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2015-11-01
Series:Italian Journal of Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.agronomy.it/index.php/agro/article/view/694
id doaj-fe82a9dccdde48a7b4ea8e79a1e1fd6a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe82a9dccdde48a7b4ea8e79a1e1fd6a2020-11-24T21:02:10ZengPAGEPress PublicationsItalian Journal of Agronomy1125-47182039-68052015-11-01101s10.4081/ija.2015.694495Economic impact of cross compliance in the field of animal welfare (Acts C18 and C16)Marisanna Speroni0Maurizio Capelletti1Antonio Bruni2Luigi Degano3CREA-FLC Council for agricultural research and economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-FLC Council for agricultural research and economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-FLC Council for agricultural research and economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsCREA-FLC Council for agricultural research and economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crop and Dairy ProductionsThe paper reports the results of assessment of animal welfare at farm level on two dairy cattle farms, identification of structural and management actions to improve the animal welfare and estimate of the costs of such actions; furthermore the economic impact of the potential support under measure 215 of the Rural Development Plan was also simulated. At the time of assessment, no severe break of compliance was detected at the two farms; however some weaknesses were identified and improvement were proposed in order to maintain the current animal welfare status and avoid future failures. The two use cases showed that investments to improve animal welfare were partly self funded in the mid and long term due to the higher milk yield and the better animal health that were expected as consequence; however, in the short term, a large part of expenses was fully borne by farmers if not supported by a public grant or higher market prices. The support provided by the measure 215 is effective in rewarding farmers who undertake to adopt standards of animal husbandry which go beyond the relevant mandatory standards.https://www.agronomy.it/index.php/agro/article/view/694Cross-compliancerural developmentAct C16Act C18animal welfarecompetitiveness.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marisanna Speroni
Maurizio Capelletti
Antonio Bruni
Luigi Degano
spellingShingle Marisanna Speroni
Maurizio Capelletti
Antonio Bruni
Luigi Degano
Economic impact of cross compliance in the field of animal welfare (Acts C18 and C16)
Italian Journal of Agronomy
Cross-compliance
rural development
Act C16
Act C18
animal welfare
competitiveness.
author_facet Marisanna Speroni
Maurizio Capelletti
Antonio Bruni
Luigi Degano
author_sort Marisanna Speroni
title Economic impact of cross compliance in the field of animal welfare (Acts C18 and C16)
title_short Economic impact of cross compliance in the field of animal welfare (Acts C18 and C16)
title_full Economic impact of cross compliance in the field of animal welfare (Acts C18 and C16)
title_fullStr Economic impact of cross compliance in the field of animal welfare (Acts C18 and C16)
title_full_unstemmed Economic impact of cross compliance in the field of animal welfare (Acts C18 and C16)
title_sort economic impact of cross compliance in the field of animal welfare (acts c18 and c16)
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Italian Journal of Agronomy
issn 1125-4718
2039-6805
publishDate 2015-11-01
description The paper reports the results of assessment of animal welfare at farm level on two dairy cattle farms, identification of structural and management actions to improve the animal welfare and estimate of the costs of such actions; furthermore the economic impact of the potential support under measure 215 of the Rural Development Plan was also simulated. At the time of assessment, no severe break of compliance was detected at the two farms; however some weaknesses were identified and improvement were proposed in order to maintain the current animal welfare status and avoid future failures. The two use cases showed that investments to improve animal welfare were partly self funded in the mid and long term due to the higher milk yield and the better animal health that were expected as consequence; however, in the short term, a large part of expenses was fully borne by farmers if not supported by a public grant or higher market prices. The support provided by the measure 215 is effective in rewarding farmers who undertake to adopt standards of animal husbandry which go beyond the relevant mandatory standards.
topic Cross-compliance
rural development
Act C16
Act C18
animal welfare
competitiveness.
url https://www.agronomy.it/index.php/agro/article/view/694
work_keys_str_mv AT marisannasperoni economicimpactofcrosscomplianceinthefieldofanimalwelfareactsc18andc16
AT mauriziocapelletti economicimpactofcrosscomplianceinthefieldofanimalwelfareactsc18andc16
AT antoniobruni economicimpactofcrosscomplianceinthefieldofanimalwelfareactsc18andc16
AT luigidegano economicimpactofcrosscomplianceinthefieldofanimalwelfareactsc18andc16
_version_ 1716776276761509888