Current States of Opinion and Future Directions on the Epidemiology of Sex Differences in Human Pain

One of the most commonly neglected findings in the human pain literature is the observation of sex differences in the mechanisms that support the phenotypic expression of pain. The present commentary describes an assessment of the prevalence of observed sex differences in various pain processes, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacob M Vigil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/280531
id doaj-fe852b322fa74d359e0954bc10ce0505
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe852b322fa74d359e0954bc10ce05052020-11-25T00:36:40ZengHindawi LimitedPain Research and Management1203-67652011-01-0116531731910.1155/2011/280531Current States of Opinion and Future Directions on the Epidemiology of Sex Differences in Human PainJacob M Vigil0University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USAOne of the most commonly neglected findings in the human pain literature is the observation of sex differences in the mechanisms that support the phenotypic expression of pain. The present commentary describes an assessment of the prevalence of observed sex differences in various pain processes, and of how expert pain researchers interpret the epidemiology and, hence, the proximate and ultimate causes of such differences. Forty-two pain investigators completed an anonymous survey on the epidemiology of sex differences in the human pain experience. Investigator responses indicated that sex differences are pervasive across various areas of pain research, that sex differences are particularly pronounced in the area of situational influences on pain behaviors, and that contemporary pain researchers largely disagree on the epidemiology of, and hence, proximate and ultimate causes of the differences. The relevance of social situational factors on sex differences in pain behaviours is discussed in the context of evolutionary, developmental, social psychology and pain sensory systems that may function, in part, for regulating interpersonal intimacy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/280531
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacob M Vigil
spellingShingle Jacob M Vigil
Current States of Opinion and Future Directions on the Epidemiology of Sex Differences in Human Pain
Pain Research and Management
author_facet Jacob M Vigil
author_sort Jacob M Vigil
title Current States of Opinion and Future Directions on the Epidemiology of Sex Differences in Human Pain
title_short Current States of Opinion and Future Directions on the Epidemiology of Sex Differences in Human Pain
title_full Current States of Opinion and Future Directions on the Epidemiology of Sex Differences in Human Pain
title_fullStr Current States of Opinion and Future Directions on the Epidemiology of Sex Differences in Human Pain
title_full_unstemmed Current States of Opinion and Future Directions on the Epidemiology of Sex Differences in Human Pain
title_sort current states of opinion and future directions on the epidemiology of sex differences in human pain
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Pain Research and Management
issn 1203-6765
publishDate 2011-01-01
description One of the most commonly neglected findings in the human pain literature is the observation of sex differences in the mechanisms that support the phenotypic expression of pain. The present commentary describes an assessment of the prevalence of observed sex differences in various pain processes, and of how expert pain researchers interpret the epidemiology and, hence, the proximate and ultimate causes of such differences. Forty-two pain investigators completed an anonymous survey on the epidemiology of sex differences in the human pain experience. Investigator responses indicated that sex differences are pervasive across various areas of pain research, that sex differences are particularly pronounced in the area of situational influences on pain behaviors, and that contemporary pain researchers largely disagree on the epidemiology of, and hence, proximate and ultimate causes of the differences. The relevance of social situational factors on sex differences in pain behaviours is discussed in the context of evolutionary, developmental, social psychology and pain sensory systems that may function, in part, for regulating interpersonal intimacy.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/280531
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobmvigil currentstatesofopinionandfuturedirectionsontheepidemiologyofsexdifferencesinhumanpain
_version_ 1725304295552712704