Interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention study

Abstract Background Over the past decades, the health sector in general has increasingly acknowledged the effectiveness of interprofessional clinical training in enhancing teamwork. In psychiatry, however, knowledge of the benefits of collaborative clinical training is sparse. This study aimed to in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Marcussen, Birgitte Nørgaard, Karen Borgnakke, Sidse Arnfred
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-01-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
IPE
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1465-6
id doaj-fe907b63e15f47989fc863ac2f3122b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe907b63e15f47989fc863ac2f3122b92020-11-25T03:40:10ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202019-01-0119111010.1186/s12909-019-1465-6Interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention studyMichael Marcussen0Birgitte Nørgaard1Karen Borgnakke2Sidse Arnfred3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen and Psychiatry SlagelseDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern DenmarkDepartment of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of CopenhagenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen and Psychiatry SlagelseAbstract Background Over the past decades, the health sector in general has increasingly acknowledged the effectiveness of interprofessional clinical training in enhancing teamwork. In psychiatry, however, knowledge of the benefits of collaborative clinical training is sparse. This study aimed to investigate the impact of interprofessional training on students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration in a psychiatric ward. Methods An intervention study assessed interprofessional clinical training in a training ward. Undergraduate students from the disciplines of medicine, nursing, psychotherapy, pedagogy, and social work were allocated either to an intervention group receiving interprofessional training or to a comparison group receiving conventional clinical training. Outcomes were assessed using the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS). Linear mixed regression was used to compare differences in mean scores postintervention, adjusted for baseline score, gender, and profession. Results Mean postintervention scores were higher in the intervention group (n = 87) than in the comparison group (n = 108) for both scales (overall sum score). For the RIPLS, the mean difference was 2.99 (95% CI 0.82 to 5.16; p = 0.007); for the AITCS it was 8.11 (95% CI 2.92–13.30; p = 0.002). Improvement in readiness for interprofessional learning and team collaboration in the intervention group remained statistically significant after adjustment for baseline differences between the two groups. Conclusion Students’ self-reported readiness for interprofessional learning and their team collaboration were improved after interprofessional clinical training. Still, further studies of both the processes and the long-term effects of undergraduate IPE in mental healthcare are needed. The study was registered March 62,017 on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03070977 (Retrospectively registrered).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1465-6Interprofessional educationIPETeam collaborationPsychiatry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Marcussen
Birgitte Nørgaard
Karen Borgnakke
Sidse Arnfred
spellingShingle Michael Marcussen
Birgitte Nørgaard
Karen Borgnakke
Sidse Arnfred
Interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention study
BMC Medical Education
Interprofessional education
IPE
Team collaboration
Psychiatry
author_facet Michael Marcussen
Birgitte Nørgaard
Karen Borgnakke
Sidse Arnfred
author_sort Michael Marcussen
title Interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention study
title_short Interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention study
title_full Interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention study
title_fullStr Interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention study
title_sort interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention study
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Abstract Background Over the past decades, the health sector in general has increasingly acknowledged the effectiveness of interprofessional clinical training in enhancing teamwork. In psychiatry, however, knowledge of the benefits of collaborative clinical training is sparse. This study aimed to investigate the impact of interprofessional training on students’ readiness for interprofessional collaboration in a psychiatric ward. Methods An intervention study assessed interprofessional clinical training in a training ward. Undergraduate students from the disciplines of medicine, nursing, psychotherapy, pedagogy, and social work were allocated either to an intervention group receiving interprofessional training or to a comparison group receiving conventional clinical training. Outcomes were assessed using the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS). Linear mixed regression was used to compare differences in mean scores postintervention, adjusted for baseline score, gender, and profession. Results Mean postintervention scores were higher in the intervention group (n = 87) than in the comparison group (n = 108) for both scales (overall sum score). For the RIPLS, the mean difference was 2.99 (95% CI 0.82 to 5.16; p = 0.007); for the AITCS it was 8.11 (95% CI 2.92–13.30; p = 0.002). Improvement in readiness for interprofessional learning and team collaboration in the intervention group remained statistically significant after adjustment for baseline differences between the two groups. Conclusion Students’ self-reported readiness for interprofessional learning and their team collaboration were improved after interprofessional clinical training. Still, further studies of both the processes and the long-term effects of undergraduate IPE in mental healthcare are needed. The study was registered March 62,017 on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03070977 (Retrospectively registrered).
topic Interprofessional education
IPE
Team collaboration
Psychiatry
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1465-6
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelmarcussen interprofessionalclinicaltraininginmentalhealthimprovesstudentsreadinessforinterprofessionalcollaborationanonrandomizedinterventionstudy
AT birgittenørgaard interprofessionalclinicaltraininginmentalhealthimprovesstudentsreadinessforinterprofessionalcollaborationanonrandomizedinterventionstudy
AT karenborgnakke interprofessionalclinicaltraininginmentalhealthimprovesstudentsreadinessforinterprofessionalcollaborationanonrandomizedinterventionstudy
AT sidsearnfred interprofessionalclinicaltraininginmentalhealthimprovesstudentsreadinessforinterprofessionalcollaborationanonrandomizedinterventionstudy
_version_ 1724535769403490304