Quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomy

Introduction Lumbar disc herniation also known as prolapsed intervertebral disc is one of the well-known causes of low back pain. Among various modalities of treatment, surgery is often kept as the last resort when conservative treatment fails. Conventional surgical methods have been replaced by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sagar Koirala, Subhash Lohani, Suresh Bishokarma, Sharad Koirala, Pratyush Shrestha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NESON 2021-03-01
Series:Nepal Journal of Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NJN/article/view/34941
id doaj-fe99111d891e483cafc9b26ad28e0f3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe99111d891e483cafc9b26ad28e0f3a2021-03-01T09:43:53ZengNESONNepal Journal of Neuroscience1813-19481813-19562021-03-01181333810.3126/njn.v18i1.3494134941Quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomySagar Koirala0Subhash Lohani1Suresh Bishokarma2Sharad Koirala3Pratyush Shrestha4Neurosurgery, Upendra Devkota Memorial National Institute of Neurological and Allied Sciences, Kathmandu, NepalNeurosurgery, Upendra Devkota Memorial National Institute of Neurological and Allied Sciences, Kathmandu, NepalNeurosurgery, Upendra Devkota Memorial National Institute of Neurological and Allied Sciences, Kathmandu, NepalCommunity Medicine, Gandaki Medical College, NepalNeurosurgery, Upendra Devkota Memorial National Institute of Neurological and Allied Sciences, Kathmandu, NepalIntroduction Lumbar disc herniation also known as prolapsed intervertebral disc is one of the well-known causes of low back pain. Among various modalities of treatment, surgery is often kept as the last resort when conservative treatment fails. Conventional surgical methods have been replaced by minimally invasive surgeries like microscopic, endoscopic and percutaneous lumbar discectomy in the hopes of decreasing post-operative pain. However, it is not uncommon for patient to have residual pain even after discectomy.  Patients also complains of reduced quality of life (QOL).  SF-36 is a standardized questionnaire for measuring QOL. Few studies have used this questionnaire to look into QOL of these patients but no such study is available in Nepalese perspective. Materials and Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among all patients undergoing single level unilateral microscopic lumbar discectomy in Upendra Devkota Memorial National Institute of Neurological Sciences from February 1st 2017 to January 31 2018. After taking informed consent, subjects were asked to respond to the preformed questionnaire and SF-36 survey. Interviews were individually conducted by the same investigator at two different time points: i) before lumbar discectomy. ii) 3 months after lumbar discectomy. QOL scores before and after were compared. Results Total of 50 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were studied. The mean age of the study group was 38.7 ± 9.9 years with male preponderance of 76%. The median duration of exacerbation of symptoms was 4 weeks. Along with pain, 64% had sensory deficit whereas 52% had motor deficit. Surgery led to significant improvement in pain score as well as marked improvement of SF 36 quality of life score at 3 months of surgery. However, age, gender, duration of symptoms or presence of sensory or motor deficit before surgery did not predict improvement in overall QOL. Conclusion Patients undergoing microscopic lumbar discectomy for prolapsed intervertebral disc have significant improvement in pain score and QOL after 3 months of surgery.https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NJN/article/view/34941microscopic lumbar discectomyprolapsed intervertebral discquality of lifesf-36
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sagar Koirala
Subhash Lohani
Suresh Bishokarma
Sharad Koirala
Pratyush Shrestha
spellingShingle Sagar Koirala
Subhash Lohani
Suresh Bishokarma
Sharad Koirala
Pratyush Shrestha
Quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomy
Nepal Journal of Neuroscience
microscopic lumbar discectomy
prolapsed intervertebral disc
quality of life
sf-36
author_facet Sagar Koirala
Subhash Lohani
Suresh Bishokarma
Sharad Koirala
Pratyush Shrestha
author_sort Sagar Koirala
title Quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomy
title_short Quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomy
title_full Quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomy
title_fullStr Quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomy
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomy
title_sort quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomy
publisher NESON
series Nepal Journal of Neuroscience
issn 1813-1948
1813-1956
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Introduction Lumbar disc herniation also known as prolapsed intervertebral disc is one of the well-known causes of low back pain. Among various modalities of treatment, surgery is often kept as the last resort when conservative treatment fails. Conventional surgical methods have been replaced by minimally invasive surgeries like microscopic, endoscopic and percutaneous lumbar discectomy in the hopes of decreasing post-operative pain. However, it is not uncommon for patient to have residual pain even after discectomy.  Patients also complains of reduced quality of life (QOL).  SF-36 is a standardized questionnaire for measuring QOL. Few studies have used this questionnaire to look into QOL of these patients but no such study is available in Nepalese perspective. Materials and Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among all patients undergoing single level unilateral microscopic lumbar discectomy in Upendra Devkota Memorial National Institute of Neurological Sciences from February 1st 2017 to January 31 2018. After taking informed consent, subjects were asked to respond to the preformed questionnaire and SF-36 survey. Interviews were individually conducted by the same investigator at two different time points: i) before lumbar discectomy. ii) 3 months after lumbar discectomy. QOL scores before and after were compared. Results Total of 50 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were studied. The mean age of the study group was 38.7 ± 9.9 years with male preponderance of 76%. The median duration of exacerbation of symptoms was 4 weeks. Along with pain, 64% had sensory deficit whereas 52% had motor deficit. Surgery led to significant improvement in pain score as well as marked improvement of SF 36 quality of life score at 3 months of surgery. However, age, gender, duration of symptoms or presence of sensory or motor deficit before surgery did not predict improvement in overall QOL. Conclusion Patients undergoing microscopic lumbar discectomy for prolapsed intervertebral disc have significant improvement in pain score and QOL after 3 months of surgery.
topic microscopic lumbar discectomy
prolapsed intervertebral disc
quality of life
sf-36
url https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NJN/article/view/34941
work_keys_str_mv AT sagarkoirala qualityoflifeafterlumbarmicrosciopicdiscectomy
AT subhashlohani qualityoflifeafterlumbarmicrosciopicdiscectomy
AT sureshbishokarma qualityoflifeafterlumbarmicrosciopicdiscectomy
AT sharadkoirala qualityoflifeafterlumbarmicrosciopicdiscectomy
AT pratyushshrestha qualityoflifeafterlumbarmicrosciopicdiscectomy
_version_ 1724246876047278080