Structural white and gray matter differences in a large sample of patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and a healthy and trauma-exposed control group: Diffusion tensor imaging and region-based morphometry

Differences in structural white and gray matter in survivors of traumatic experiences have been related to the development and maintenance of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, there are very few studies on diffusion tensor imaging and region based morphometry comparing patients with PTS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Siehl, Manon Wicking, Sebastian Pohlack, Tobias Winkelmann, Francesca Zidda, Frauke Steiger-White, John King, Neil Burgess, Herta Flor, Frauke Nees
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:NeuroImage: Clinical
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158220302618
id doaj-feefbad49c1b4bf49f0ed0d77c131934
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Siehl
Manon Wicking
Sebastian Pohlack
Tobias Winkelmann
Francesca Zidda
Frauke Steiger-White
John King
Neil Burgess
Herta Flor
Frauke Nees
spellingShingle Sebastian Siehl
Manon Wicking
Sebastian Pohlack
Tobias Winkelmann
Francesca Zidda
Frauke Steiger-White
John King
Neil Burgess
Herta Flor
Frauke Nees
Structural white and gray matter differences in a large sample of patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and a healthy and trauma-exposed control group: Diffusion tensor imaging and region-based morphometry
NeuroImage: Clinical
White and gray matter
PTSD
Trauma
Diffusion tensor imaging
Neuroplasticity
author_facet Sebastian Siehl
Manon Wicking
Sebastian Pohlack
Tobias Winkelmann
Francesca Zidda
Frauke Steiger-White
John King
Neil Burgess
Herta Flor
Frauke Nees
author_sort Sebastian Siehl
title Structural white and gray matter differences in a large sample of patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and a healthy and trauma-exposed control group: Diffusion tensor imaging and region-based morphometry
title_short Structural white and gray matter differences in a large sample of patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and a healthy and trauma-exposed control group: Diffusion tensor imaging and region-based morphometry
title_full Structural white and gray matter differences in a large sample of patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and a healthy and trauma-exposed control group: Diffusion tensor imaging and region-based morphometry
title_fullStr Structural white and gray matter differences in a large sample of patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and a healthy and trauma-exposed control group: Diffusion tensor imaging and region-based morphometry
title_full_unstemmed Structural white and gray matter differences in a large sample of patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and a healthy and trauma-exposed control group: Diffusion tensor imaging and region-based morphometry
title_sort structural white and gray matter differences in a large sample of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder and a healthy and trauma-exposed control group: diffusion tensor imaging and region-based morphometry
publisher Elsevier
series NeuroImage: Clinical
issn 2213-1582
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Differences in structural white and gray matter in survivors of traumatic experiences have been related to the development and maintenance of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, there are very few studies on diffusion tensor imaging and region based morphometry comparing patients with PTSD to two control groups, namely healthy individuals with or without trauma experience. It is also unknown if differences in white and gray matter are associated. In this cross-sectional study, we examined white- and gray matter differences between 44 patients with PTSD, 49 trauma control and 61 healthy control subjects. We compared the groups applying Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) for a whole brain white matter analysis as well as region of interest analyses for white and gray matter. First, trauma control subjects in comparison to patients with PTSD and healthy control subjects showed significantly a) higher fractional anisotropy (FA) in the left corticospinal tract and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus than patients with PTSD, b) higher FA in the left inferior fronto-occipital-, right inferior– and right superior longitudinal fasciculi, c) higher FA in the forceps minor and d) higher volume of the left and right anterior insulae. Second, we show significant correlations between the FA in the forceps minor and the gray matter volume in the left and right anterior insulae. Third, the mean FA value in the forceps minor correlated negatively with symptom severity of PTSD and depression as well as trait anxiety, whereas the gray matter volume in the left anterior insula correlated negatively with symptom severity in PTSD. Our findings underline the importance of brain structures critically involved in emotion regulation and salience mapping. While previous studies associated these processes primarily to functional and task-based differences in brain activity, we argue that morphometrical white and gray matter differences could serve as targets in neuroscientifically-informed prevention and treatment interventions for PTSD.
topic White and gray matter
PTSD
Trauma
Diffusion tensor imaging
Neuroplasticity
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158220302618
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastiansiehl structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
AT manonwicking structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
AT sebastianpohlack structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
AT tobiaswinkelmann structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
AT francescazidda structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
AT fraukesteigerwhite structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
AT johnking structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
AT neilburgess structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
AT hertaflor structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
AT fraukenees structuralwhiteandgraymatterdifferencesinalargesampleofpatientswithposttraumaticstressdisorderandahealthyandtraumaexposedcontrolgroupdiffusiontensorimagingandregionbasedmorphometry
_version_ 1724377941058519040
spelling doaj-feefbad49c1b4bf49f0ed0d77c1319342020-12-19T05:06:09ZengElsevierNeuroImage: Clinical2213-15822020-01-0128102424Structural white and gray matter differences in a large sample of patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and a healthy and trauma-exposed control group: Diffusion tensor imaging and region-based morphometrySebastian Siehl0Manon Wicking1Sebastian Pohlack2Tobias Winkelmann3Francesca Zidda4Frauke Steiger-White5John King6Neil Burgess7Herta Flor8Frauke Nees9Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Graduate School of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Corresponding authors at: Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, J5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany (S. Siehl). Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Preußerstraße 1-9, 24105 Kiel, Germany (F. Nees).Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Pain Medicine, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr University, Bochum, GermanyInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyUCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Clinical, Education and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United KingdomUCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, LondonInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany; Corresponding authors at: Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, J5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany (S. Siehl). Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Preußerstraße 1-9, 24105 Kiel, Germany (F. Nees).Differences in structural white and gray matter in survivors of traumatic experiences have been related to the development and maintenance of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, there are very few studies on diffusion tensor imaging and region based morphometry comparing patients with PTSD to two control groups, namely healthy individuals with or without trauma experience. It is also unknown if differences in white and gray matter are associated. In this cross-sectional study, we examined white- and gray matter differences between 44 patients with PTSD, 49 trauma control and 61 healthy control subjects. We compared the groups applying Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) for a whole brain white matter analysis as well as region of interest analyses for white and gray matter. First, trauma control subjects in comparison to patients with PTSD and healthy control subjects showed significantly a) higher fractional anisotropy (FA) in the left corticospinal tract and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus than patients with PTSD, b) higher FA in the left inferior fronto-occipital-, right inferior– and right superior longitudinal fasciculi, c) higher FA in the forceps minor and d) higher volume of the left and right anterior insulae. Second, we show significant correlations between the FA in the forceps minor and the gray matter volume in the left and right anterior insulae. Third, the mean FA value in the forceps minor correlated negatively with symptom severity of PTSD and depression as well as trait anxiety, whereas the gray matter volume in the left anterior insula correlated negatively with symptom severity in PTSD. Our findings underline the importance of brain structures critically involved in emotion regulation and salience mapping. While previous studies associated these processes primarily to functional and task-based differences in brain activity, we argue that morphometrical white and gray matter differences could serve as targets in neuroscientifically-informed prevention and treatment interventions for PTSD.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158220302618White and gray matterPTSDTraumaDiffusion tensor imagingNeuroplasticity