Analysis of Surgical Treatments for Circumferentially Protruding Haemorrhoids: Complete Excision with Repair Using Flaps Versus Primary Excision with Secondary Suture-ligation

Circumferentially protruding haemorrhoids (CPH) are troublesome lesions for both patients and surgeons, and in most cases demand surgical intervention. However, such surgery carries the risks of complications and recurrence. This study compared two surgical procedures in order to identify the optima...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jin C. Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2006-07-01
Series:Asian Journal of Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958409600713
id doaj-fef12127d0fa411c806a8bc6d499ebdf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fef12127d0fa411c806a8bc6d499ebdf2020-11-24T22:57:47ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842006-07-0129312813410.1016/S1015-9584(09)60071-3Analysis of Surgical Treatments for Circumferentially Protruding Haemorrhoids: Complete Excision with Repair Using Flaps Versus Primary Excision with Secondary Suture-ligationJin C. KimCircumferentially protruding haemorrhoids (CPH) are troublesome lesions for both patients and surgeons, and in most cases demand surgical intervention. However, such surgery carries the risks of complications and recurrence. This study compared two surgical procedures in order to identify the optimal approach for CPH. Methods: All patients underwent an open haemorrhoidectomy for primary haemorrhoids, after which patients underwent either of the two procedures for secondary haemorrhoids. Group 1 (n = 104) comprised patients who underwent submucosal excision with repair using remnant anodermal flaps; this procedure was performed between 1991 and 1996. Group 2 (n = 113) comprised patients who underwent suture-ligation; this procedure was performed between 1997 and 2002. Surgical outcomes including surgical variables, wound healing, complications and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results: For group 2, surgical time and duration of analgesic use (mean ± SEM, 22 ± 0 minutes and 3 ± 0 days, respectively) were significantly shorter than for group 1 (28 ± 1 minutes and 4 ± 0 days, respectively; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). In terms of complication rates, there was no significant difference between group 2 (15 patients, 14%) and group 1 (25 patients, 22%), and most complications were satisfactorily treated using conservative management. Skin tags and perianal abscesses were more frequent in group 1 than in group 2. The final follow-up was undertaken at 6 months postoperatively, at which time there were no recurrences in patients of either group. For both groups, over 90% of patients reported that they were satisfied with the outcome of surgery. Conclusion: Although both surgical approaches were successful for treating CPH, open haemorrhoidectomy for primary haemorrhoids combined with suture-ligation for secondary haemorrhoids appears to be the optimal approach considering its rapidity, simplicity and lower associated costs.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958409600713circumferentialflaphaemorrhoidsurgical techniquesuture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jin C. Kim
spellingShingle Jin C. Kim
Analysis of Surgical Treatments for Circumferentially Protruding Haemorrhoids: Complete Excision with Repair Using Flaps Versus Primary Excision with Secondary Suture-ligation
Asian Journal of Surgery
circumferential
flap
haemorrhoid
surgical technique
suture
author_facet Jin C. Kim
author_sort Jin C. Kim
title Analysis of Surgical Treatments for Circumferentially Protruding Haemorrhoids: Complete Excision with Repair Using Flaps Versus Primary Excision with Secondary Suture-ligation
title_short Analysis of Surgical Treatments for Circumferentially Protruding Haemorrhoids: Complete Excision with Repair Using Flaps Versus Primary Excision with Secondary Suture-ligation
title_full Analysis of Surgical Treatments for Circumferentially Protruding Haemorrhoids: Complete Excision with Repair Using Flaps Versus Primary Excision with Secondary Suture-ligation
title_fullStr Analysis of Surgical Treatments for Circumferentially Protruding Haemorrhoids: Complete Excision with Repair Using Flaps Versus Primary Excision with Secondary Suture-ligation
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Surgical Treatments for Circumferentially Protruding Haemorrhoids: Complete Excision with Repair Using Flaps Versus Primary Excision with Secondary Suture-ligation
title_sort analysis of surgical treatments for circumferentially protruding haemorrhoids: complete excision with repair using flaps versus primary excision with secondary suture-ligation
publisher Elsevier
series Asian Journal of Surgery
issn 1015-9584
publishDate 2006-07-01
description Circumferentially protruding haemorrhoids (CPH) are troublesome lesions for both patients and surgeons, and in most cases demand surgical intervention. However, such surgery carries the risks of complications and recurrence. This study compared two surgical procedures in order to identify the optimal approach for CPH. Methods: All patients underwent an open haemorrhoidectomy for primary haemorrhoids, after which patients underwent either of the two procedures for secondary haemorrhoids. Group 1 (n = 104) comprised patients who underwent submucosal excision with repair using remnant anodermal flaps; this procedure was performed between 1991 and 1996. Group 2 (n = 113) comprised patients who underwent suture-ligation; this procedure was performed between 1997 and 2002. Surgical outcomes including surgical variables, wound healing, complications and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results: For group 2, surgical time and duration of analgesic use (mean ± SEM, 22 ± 0 minutes and 3 ± 0 days, respectively) were significantly shorter than for group 1 (28 ± 1 minutes and 4 ± 0 days, respectively; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). In terms of complication rates, there was no significant difference between group 2 (15 patients, 14%) and group 1 (25 patients, 22%), and most complications were satisfactorily treated using conservative management. Skin tags and perianal abscesses were more frequent in group 1 than in group 2. The final follow-up was undertaken at 6 months postoperatively, at which time there were no recurrences in patients of either group. For both groups, over 90% of patients reported that they were satisfied with the outcome of surgery. Conclusion: Although both surgical approaches were successful for treating CPH, open haemorrhoidectomy for primary haemorrhoids combined with suture-ligation for secondary haemorrhoids appears to be the optimal approach considering its rapidity, simplicity and lower associated costs.
topic circumferential
flap
haemorrhoid
surgical technique
suture
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958409600713
work_keys_str_mv AT jinckim analysisofsurgicaltreatmentsforcircumferentiallyprotrudinghaemorrhoidscompleteexcisionwithrepairusingflapsversusprimaryexcisionwithsecondarysutureligation
_version_ 1725649217658028032