Orthoptic Changes following Photorefractive Keratectomy

Purpose: To report orthoptic changes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: This interventional case series included 297 eyes of 150 patients scheduled for PRK. Complete ophthalmologic evaluations focusing on orthoptic examinations were performed before and 3 months after PRK. Results:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhale Rajavi, Nader Nassiri, Monir Azizzadeh, Alireza Ramezani, Mehdi Yaseri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Knowledge E 2011-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2011;volume=6;issue=2;spage=92;epage=100;aulast=Rajavi
id doaj-ff01a75c2420437cbaf2700ba0c11d54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ff01a75c2420437cbaf2700ba0c11d542020-11-25T01:53:43ZengKnowledge EJournal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research2008-322X2011-01-016292100Orthoptic Changes following Photorefractive KeratectomyZhale RajaviNader NassiriMonir AzizzadehAlireza RamezaniMehdi YaseriPurpose: To report orthoptic changes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: This interventional case series included 297 eyes of 150 patients scheduled for PRK. Complete ophthalmologic evaluations focusing on orthoptic examinations were performed before and 3 months after PRK. Results: Before PRK, 2 (1.3%) patients had esotropia which remained unchanged; 3 (2%) patients had far exotropia which improved after the procedure. Of 12 cases (8%) with initial exotropia at near, 3 (2%) cases became orthophoric, however 6 patients (4%) developed new near exotropia. A significant reduction in convergence and divergence amplitudes (P < 0.001) and a significant increase in near point of convergence (NPC) (P < 0.006) were noticed after PRK. A reduction ≥ 10 PD in convergence amplitude and ≥ 5 PD in divergence amplitude occurred in 10 and 5 patients, respectively. Four patients had initial NPC > 10 cm which remained unchanged after surgery. Out of 9 (6%) patients with baseline stereopsis > 60 seconds of arc, 2 (1.33%) showed an improvement in stereopsis following PRK. No patient developed diplopia postoperatively. Conclusion: Preexisting strabismus may improve or remain unchanged after PRK, and new deviations can develop following the procedure. A decrease in fusional amplitudes, an increase in NPC, and an improvement in stereopsis may also occur after PRK. Preoperative evaluation of orthoptic status for detection of baseline abnormalities and identification of susceptible patients seem advisable.http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2011;volume=6;issue=2;spage=92;epage=100;aulast=RajaviOrthoptic Changes; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Strabismus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhale Rajavi
Nader Nassiri
Monir Azizzadeh
Alireza Ramezani
Mehdi Yaseri
spellingShingle Zhale Rajavi
Nader Nassiri
Monir Azizzadeh
Alireza Ramezani
Mehdi Yaseri
Orthoptic Changes following Photorefractive Keratectomy
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
Orthoptic Changes; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Strabismus
author_facet Zhale Rajavi
Nader Nassiri
Monir Azizzadeh
Alireza Ramezani
Mehdi Yaseri
author_sort Zhale Rajavi
title Orthoptic Changes following Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_short Orthoptic Changes following Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full Orthoptic Changes following Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_fullStr Orthoptic Changes following Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full_unstemmed Orthoptic Changes following Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_sort orthoptic changes following photorefractive keratectomy
publisher Knowledge E
series Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
issn 2008-322X
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Purpose: To report orthoptic changes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: This interventional case series included 297 eyes of 150 patients scheduled for PRK. Complete ophthalmologic evaluations focusing on orthoptic examinations were performed before and 3 months after PRK. Results: Before PRK, 2 (1.3%) patients had esotropia which remained unchanged; 3 (2%) patients had far exotropia which improved after the procedure. Of 12 cases (8%) with initial exotropia at near, 3 (2%) cases became orthophoric, however 6 patients (4%) developed new near exotropia. A significant reduction in convergence and divergence amplitudes (P < 0.001) and a significant increase in near point of convergence (NPC) (P < 0.006) were noticed after PRK. A reduction ≥ 10 PD in convergence amplitude and ≥ 5 PD in divergence amplitude occurred in 10 and 5 patients, respectively. Four patients had initial NPC > 10 cm which remained unchanged after surgery. Out of 9 (6%) patients with baseline stereopsis > 60 seconds of arc, 2 (1.33%) showed an improvement in stereopsis following PRK. No patient developed diplopia postoperatively. Conclusion: Preexisting strabismus may improve or remain unchanged after PRK, and new deviations can develop following the procedure. A decrease in fusional amplitudes, an increase in NPC, and an improvement in stereopsis may also occur after PRK. Preoperative evaluation of orthoptic status for detection of baseline abnormalities and identification of susceptible patients seem advisable.
topic Orthoptic Changes; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Strabismus
url http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2011;volume=6;issue=2;spage=92;epage=100;aulast=Rajavi
work_keys_str_mv AT zhalerajavi orthopticchangesfollowingphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT nadernassiri orthopticchangesfollowingphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT monirazizzadeh orthopticchangesfollowingphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT alirezaramezani orthopticchangesfollowingphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT mehdiyaseri orthopticchangesfollowingphotorefractivekeratectomy
_version_ 1724989468862054400