Human-agent coordination in a group formation game

Abstract Coordination and cooperation between humans and autonomous agents in cooperative games raise interesting questions on human decision making and behaviour changes. Here we report our findings from a group formation game in a small-world network of different mixes of human and agent players,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tuomas Takko, Kunal Bhattacharya, Daniel Monsivais, Kimmo Kaski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90123-8
id doaj-ff395f92dc8143aebdb371a438cc7f90
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ff395f92dc8143aebdb371a438cc7f902021-05-30T11:34:12ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-05-0111111010.1038/s41598-021-90123-8Human-agent coordination in a group formation gameTuomas Takko0Kunal Bhattacharya1Daniel Monsivais2Kimmo Kaski3Department of Computer Science, Aalto University School of ScienceDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University School of ScienceDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University School of ScienceDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University School of ScienceAbstract Coordination and cooperation between humans and autonomous agents in cooperative games raise interesting questions on human decision making and behaviour changes. Here we report our findings from a group formation game in a small-world network of different mixes of human and agent players, aiming to achieve connected clusters of the same colour by swapping places with neighbouring players using non-overlapping information. In the experiments the human players are incentivized by rewarding to prioritize their own cluster while the model of agents’ decision making is derived from our previous experiment of purely cooperative game between human players. The experiments were performed by grouping the players in three different setups to investigate the overall effect of having cooperative autonomous agents within teams. We observe that the human subjects adjust to autonomous agents by being less risk averse, while keeping the overall performance efficient by splitting the behaviour into selfish and cooperative actions performed during the rounds of the game. Moreover, results from two hybrid human-agent setups suggest that the group composition affects the evolution of clusters. Our findings indicate that in purely or lesser cooperative settings, providing more control to humans could help in maximizing the overall performance of hybrid systems.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90123-8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tuomas Takko
Kunal Bhattacharya
Daniel Monsivais
Kimmo Kaski
spellingShingle Tuomas Takko
Kunal Bhattacharya
Daniel Monsivais
Kimmo Kaski
Human-agent coordination in a group formation game
Scientific Reports
author_facet Tuomas Takko
Kunal Bhattacharya
Daniel Monsivais
Kimmo Kaski
author_sort Tuomas Takko
title Human-agent coordination in a group formation game
title_short Human-agent coordination in a group formation game
title_full Human-agent coordination in a group formation game
title_fullStr Human-agent coordination in a group formation game
title_full_unstemmed Human-agent coordination in a group formation game
title_sort human-agent coordination in a group formation game
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Coordination and cooperation between humans and autonomous agents in cooperative games raise interesting questions on human decision making and behaviour changes. Here we report our findings from a group formation game in a small-world network of different mixes of human and agent players, aiming to achieve connected clusters of the same colour by swapping places with neighbouring players using non-overlapping information. In the experiments the human players are incentivized by rewarding to prioritize their own cluster while the model of agents’ decision making is derived from our previous experiment of purely cooperative game between human players. The experiments were performed by grouping the players in three different setups to investigate the overall effect of having cooperative autonomous agents within teams. We observe that the human subjects adjust to autonomous agents by being less risk averse, while keeping the overall performance efficient by splitting the behaviour into selfish and cooperative actions performed during the rounds of the game. Moreover, results from two hybrid human-agent setups suggest that the group composition affects the evolution of clusters. Our findings indicate that in purely or lesser cooperative settings, providing more control to humans could help in maximizing the overall performance of hybrid systems.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90123-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tuomastakko humanagentcoordinationinagroupformationgame
AT kunalbhattacharya humanagentcoordinationinagroupformationgame
AT danielmonsivais humanagentcoordinationinagroupformationgame
AT kimmokaski humanagentcoordinationinagroupformationgame
_version_ 1721420323572678656