Public or private primary health care: A comparison of efficiency and patient satisfaction

The organization of health care is one of the most complex present day challenges. Like other countries that run socialized health care systems, Icelanders face the question of the role of private enterprise in health care. The objective of this study was two-fold: to compare the cost of 17 private...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Héðinn Sigurðsson, Sunna Gestsdóttir, Sigríður Halldórsdóttir, Kristjan G. Guðmundsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Iceland 2018-06-01
Series:Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.irpa.is/article/view/2770
id doaj-ffaedcd2af0a4b38a21686947ac84c57
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ffaedcd2af0a4b38a21686947ac84c572020-11-24T21:28:32ZengUniversity of IcelandStjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla1670-68031670-679X2018-06-01142698410.13177/irpa.a.2018.14.2.42290Public or private primary health care: A comparison of efficiency and patient satisfactionHéðinn SigurðssonSunna GestsdóttirSigríður HalldórsdóttirKristjan G. GuðmundssonThe organization of health care is one of the most complex present day challenges. Like other countries that run socialized health care systems, Icelanders face the question of the role of private enterprise in health care. The objective of this study was two-fold: to compare the cost of 17 private and state-run health care centers in the metropolitan area, and to compare consumer satisfaction related to these. At the beginning of Icelandic settlement, there were statutory laws decreeing that community services should be provided for those in need. By the Health Care Act in 1973, the Icelandic health care system fell under the Nordic welfare society with equal access and a tight safety net. The results show that the private health care centers had a low cost per work unit, but not the lowest. Four to seven state run health care centers had less expenditure per patient than the private centers. The cost of each doctor’s position was highest in one of the private clinics. Patient satisfaction surveys showed that there is no difference in the quality of services between these two different operating modes. A conclusion can be drawn from this study that it is not clear whether private health care improves the use of public funds or increases the quality of services.http://www.irpa.is/article/view/2770Rannsóknir í heilbrigðisþjónustuheilsugæslaríkisrekstureinkareksturstarfsfólk í heilsugæslu.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Héðinn Sigurðsson
Sunna Gestsdóttir
Sigríður Halldórsdóttir
Kristjan G. Guðmundsson
spellingShingle Héðinn Sigurðsson
Sunna Gestsdóttir
Sigríður Halldórsdóttir
Kristjan G. Guðmundsson
Public or private primary health care: A comparison of efficiency and patient satisfaction
Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla
Rannsóknir í heilbrigðisþjónustu
heilsugæsla
ríkisrekstur
einkarekstur
starfsfólk í heilsugæslu.
author_facet Héðinn Sigurðsson
Sunna Gestsdóttir
Sigríður Halldórsdóttir
Kristjan G. Guðmundsson
author_sort Héðinn Sigurðsson
title Public or private primary health care: A comparison of efficiency and patient satisfaction
title_short Public or private primary health care: A comparison of efficiency and patient satisfaction
title_full Public or private primary health care: A comparison of efficiency and patient satisfaction
title_fullStr Public or private primary health care: A comparison of efficiency and patient satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Public or private primary health care: A comparison of efficiency and patient satisfaction
title_sort public or private primary health care: a comparison of efficiency and patient satisfaction
publisher University of Iceland
series Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla
issn 1670-6803
1670-679X
publishDate 2018-06-01
description The organization of health care is one of the most complex present day challenges. Like other countries that run socialized health care systems, Icelanders face the question of the role of private enterprise in health care. The objective of this study was two-fold: to compare the cost of 17 private and state-run health care centers in the metropolitan area, and to compare consumer satisfaction related to these. At the beginning of Icelandic settlement, there were statutory laws decreeing that community services should be provided for those in need. By the Health Care Act in 1973, the Icelandic health care system fell under the Nordic welfare society with equal access and a tight safety net. The results show that the private health care centers had a low cost per work unit, but not the lowest. Four to seven state run health care centers had less expenditure per patient than the private centers. The cost of each doctor’s position was highest in one of the private clinics. Patient satisfaction surveys showed that there is no difference in the quality of services between these two different operating modes. A conclusion can be drawn from this study that it is not clear whether private health care improves the use of public funds or increases the quality of services.
topic Rannsóknir í heilbrigðisþjónustu
heilsugæsla
ríkisrekstur
einkarekstur
starfsfólk í heilsugæslu.
url http://www.irpa.is/article/view/2770
work_keys_str_mv AT heðinnsigurðsson publicorprivateprimaryhealthcareacomparisonofefficiencyandpatientsatisfaction
AT sunnagestsdottir publicorprivateprimaryhealthcareacomparisonofefficiencyandpatientsatisfaction
AT sigriðurhalldorsdottir publicorprivateprimaryhealthcareacomparisonofefficiencyandpatientsatisfaction
AT kristjangguðmundsson publicorprivateprimaryhealthcareacomparisonofefficiencyandpatientsatisfaction
_version_ 1725970015791874048