Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods
Due to the advance in technology, the type of data is getting more complicated and large-scale. To analyze such complex data, more advanced technique is required. In case of omics data from two different groups, it is interesting to find significant biomarkers between two groups while controlling er...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Metabolites |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/11/1/53 |
id |
doaj-ffbc04013a2943429ae9465f3721064d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ffbc04013a2943429ae9465f3721064d2021-01-15T00:03:29ZengMDPI AGMetabolites2218-19892021-01-0111535310.3390/metabo11010053Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control MethodsShin June Kim0Youngjae Oh1Jaesik Jeong2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, KoreaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, KoreaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, KoreaDue to the advance in technology, the type of data is getting more complicated and large-scale. To analyze such complex data, more advanced technique is required. In case of omics data from two different groups, it is interesting to find significant biomarkers between two groups while controlling error rate such as false discovery rate (FDR). Over the last few decades, a lot of methods that control local false discovery rate have been developed, ranging from one-dimensional to <i>k</i>-dimensional FDR procedure. For comparison study, we select three of them, which have unique and significant properties: Efron et al. (2001), Ploner et al. (2006), and Kim et al. (2018) in chronological order. The first approach is one-dimensional approach while the other two are two-dimensional ones. Furthermore, we consider two more variants of Ploner’s approach. We compare the performance of those methods on both simulated and real data.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/11/1/53biomarkerfamilywise error ratefalse discovery ratelarge scale inference |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shin June Kim Youngjae Oh Jaesik Jeong |
spellingShingle |
Shin June Kim Youngjae Oh Jaesik Jeong Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods Metabolites biomarker familywise error rate false discovery rate large scale inference |
author_facet |
Shin June Kim Youngjae Oh Jaesik Jeong |
author_sort |
Shin June Kim |
title |
Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods |
title_short |
Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods |
title_full |
Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods |
title_fullStr |
Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods |
title_sort |
comprehensive comparative analysis of local false discovery rate control methods |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Metabolites |
issn |
2218-1989 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Due to the advance in technology, the type of data is getting more complicated and large-scale. To analyze such complex data, more advanced technique is required. In case of omics data from two different groups, it is interesting to find significant biomarkers between two groups while controlling error rate such as false discovery rate (FDR). Over the last few decades, a lot of methods that control local false discovery rate have been developed, ranging from one-dimensional to <i>k</i>-dimensional FDR procedure. For comparison study, we select three of them, which have unique and significant properties: Efron et al. (2001), Ploner et al. (2006), and Kim et al. (2018) in chronological order. The first approach is one-dimensional approach while the other two are two-dimensional ones. Furthermore, we consider two more variants of Ploner’s approach. We compare the performance of those methods on both simulated and real data. |
topic |
biomarker familywise error rate false discovery rate large scale inference |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/11/1/53 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shinjunekim comprehensivecomparativeanalysisoflocalfalsediscoveryratecontrolmethods AT youngjaeoh comprehensivecomparativeanalysisoflocalfalsediscoveryratecontrolmethods AT jaesikjeong comprehensivecomparativeanalysisoflocalfalsediscoveryratecontrolmethods |
_version_ |
1724337818584481792 |