Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods

Due to the advance in technology, the type of data is getting more complicated and large-scale. To analyze such complex data, more advanced technique is required. In case of omics data from two different groups, it is interesting to find significant biomarkers between two groups while controlling er...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shin June Kim, Youngjae Oh, Jaesik Jeong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Metabolites
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/11/1/53
id doaj-ffbc04013a2943429ae9465f3721064d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ffbc04013a2943429ae9465f3721064d2021-01-15T00:03:29ZengMDPI AGMetabolites2218-19892021-01-0111535310.3390/metabo11010053Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control MethodsShin June Kim0Youngjae Oh1Jaesik Jeong2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, KoreaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, KoreaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, KoreaDue to the advance in technology, the type of data is getting more complicated and large-scale. To analyze such complex data, more advanced technique is required. In case of omics data from two different groups, it is interesting to find significant biomarkers between two groups while controlling error rate such as false discovery rate (FDR). Over the last few decades, a lot of methods that control local false discovery rate have been developed, ranging from one-dimensional to <i>k</i>-dimensional FDR procedure. For comparison study, we select three of them, which have unique and significant properties: Efron et al. (2001), Ploner et al. (2006), and Kim et al. (2018) in chronological order. The first approach is one-dimensional approach while the other two are two-dimensional ones. Furthermore, we consider two more variants of Ploner’s approach. We compare the performance of those methods on both simulated and real data.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/11/1/53biomarkerfamilywise error ratefalse discovery ratelarge scale inference
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shin June Kim
Youngjae Oh
Jaesik Jeong
spellingShingle Shin June Kim
Youngjae Oh
Jaesik Jeong
Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods
Metabolites
biomarker
familywise error rate
false discovery rate
large scale inference
author_facet Shin June Kim
Youngjae Oh
Jaesik Jeong
author_sort Shin June Kim
title Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods
title_short Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods
title_full Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods
title_fullStr Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Local False Discovery Rate Control Methods
title_sort comprehensive comparative analysis of local false discovery rate control methods
publisher MDPI AG
series Metabolites
issn 2218-1989
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Due to the advance in technology, the type of data is getting more complicated and large-scale. To analyze such complex data, more advanced technique is required. In case of omics data from two different groups, it is interesting to find significant biomarkers between two groups while controlling error rate such as false discovery rate (FDR). Over the last few decades, a lot of methods that control local false discovery rate have been developed, ranging from one-dimensional to <i>k</i>-dimensional FDR procedure. For comparison study, we select three of them, which have unique and significant properties: Efron et al. (2001), Ploner et al. (2006), and Kim et al. (2018) in chronological order. The first approach is one-dimensional approach while the other two are two-dimensional ones. Furthermore, we consider two more variants of Ploner’s approach. We compare the performance of those methods on both simulated and real data.
topic biomarker
familywise error rate
false discovery rate
large scale inference
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/11/1/53
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjunekim comprehensivecomparativeanalysisoflocalfalsediscoveryratecontrolmethods
AT youngjaeoh comprehensivecomparativeanalysisoflocalfalsediscoveryratecontrolmethods
AT jaesikjeong comprehensivecomparativeanalysisoflocalfalsediscoveryratecontrolmethods
_version_ 1724337818584481792