Comics Polysystem in Iran: A Case Study of the Persian Translations of Les Aventures de Tintin

With the advent of Polysystem Theory in the 1970s, Translation Studies (TS) experienced a significant transformation. This approach incorporated the sociocultural context into the analysis of translation. The influence of Even-Zohar's Polysystem Theory ("Polysystem Studies") was so ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenevisi, M. Sadegh (Author), Sanatifar, M. Saleh (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Modern Languages and Cultural Studies, University of Alberta, 2016.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02135 am a22001453u 4500
001 38462
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kenevisi, M. Sadegh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sanatifar, M. Saleh  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comics Polysystem in Iran: A Case Study of the Persian Translations of Les Aventures de Tintin 
260 |b Department of Modern Languages and Cultural Studies, University of Alberta,   |c 2016. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://eprints.usm.my/38462/1/Comics_Polysystem_in_Iran_A_Case_Study_of_the.pdf 
520 |a With the advent of Polysystem Theory in the 1970s, Translation Studies (TS) experienced a significant transformation. This approach incorporated the sociocultural context into the analysis of translation. The influence of Even-Zohar's Polysystem Theory ("Polysystem Studies") was so marked that Bassnett and Lefevere coined the new term "Cultural Turn" to describe the transformation in TS (xxi). As a result of this transformation, translation can no longer be regarded as an accumulation of mere strings of discrete linguistic signs, but rather as a cultural entity that is the outcome of two possibly divergent cultural repertoires. Polysystem Theory envisages culture as a complex network of related systems, of which literature is one. As an internally related and dynamic polysystem, literature forms a network of relations called "literary" (Even-Zohar 28). These relations are composed of the canonized or "central" and non-canonized or "peripheral" strata. In other words, while one literature may occupy a secondary position in the literary polysystem and scarcely affect the polysystem's central configuration, another literature may come to dominate the centre and develop into a canonical work. According to Even-Zohar, a peripheral position is assumed for translated literature ("Culture Repertoire" 389-403). This peripheral position is postulated to be even more marked for children's literature, as Even-Zohar considers it to be already situated in a peripheral and secondary place in the literary system of the source culture ("Polysystem Studies" 131). 
546 |a en 
650 0 4 |a P1-1091 Philology. Linguistics(General)