Historical development of administration architecture in Malaysia (15th-21st century)

The main purpose of this paper is to document the development of the state administration building in Malaysia before and after the independence era, in relation to the evolutionary period of Malaysia`s political, social and economic history. Multiple case study approach [19] is applied by referring...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bava Mohidin, Hazrina (Author), Ismail, Alice Sabrina (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Physics Publishing, 2014.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01742 am a22001453u 4500
001 53042
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bava Mohidin, Hazrina  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ismail, Alice Sabrina  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Historical development of administration architecture in Malaysia (15th-21st century) 
260 |b Institute of Physics Publishing,   |c 2014. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/53042/1/HazrinaBavaMohidin2014_Historicaldevelopmentofadministration.pdf 
520 |a The main purpose of this paper is to document the development of the state administration building in Malaysia before and after the independence era, in relation to the evolutionary period of Malaysia`s political, social and economic history. Multiple case study approach [19] is applied by referring to six prominent case studies to represent state administrative buildings from various phases of Malaysian history beginning from 14th century to 21st century as exemplar. Since this paper formulates new ways to approach and describes state administrative building design and factors that influence them, it uses interpretivism paradigm and (semiotics) as methodological approach to study the relationship between the building design and contextual elements. This paper, therefore, offers new insights, which not only add to knowledge in this field by widening and strengthening the understanding of state administrative architecture in Malaysia, but also are valuable for range of associated fields including architectural semiotics and non verbal communication. This is because this paper reveals deep understandings of the built form and material environment operating as a sign in a cultural and social context. 
546 |a en 
650 0 4 |a TH Building construction