|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01622 am a22001933u 4500 |
| 001 |
71880 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Nejat, P.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Calautit, J. K.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Abd. Majid, M. Z.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Hughes, B. R.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Zeynali, I.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Jomehzadeh, F.
|e author
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Wind tunnel and numerical data on the ventilation performance of windcatcher with wing wall
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b Elsevier Inc.,
|c 2016.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/71880/1/PayamNejat2016_WindTunnelandNumericalDataontheVentilation.pdf
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The data presented in this article were the basis for the study reported in the research articles entitled "Evaluation of a two-sided windcatcher integrated with wing wall (as a new design) and comparison with a conventional windcatcher" (P. Nejat, J.K. Calautit, M.Z.A. Majid, B.R. Hughes, I. Zeynali, F. Jomehzadeh, 2016) [1] which presents the effect of wing wall on the air flow distribution under using the windcatchers as a natural ventilation equipment. Here, we detail the wind tunnel testing and numerical set-up used for obtaining the data on ventilation rates and indoor airflow distribution inside a test room with a two-sided windcatcher and wing wall. Three models were integrated with wing wall angled at 30°, 45° and 60° and another windcatcher was a conventional two-sided device. The computer-aided design (CAD) three-dimensional geometries which were produced using Solid Edge modeler are also included in the data article.
|
| 546 |
|
|
|a en
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
|
