Cue properties change timing strategies in group movement synchronisation

To maintain synchrony in group activities, each individual within the group must continuously correct their movements to remain in time with the temporal cues available. Cues might originate from one or more members of the group. Current research suggests that when synchronising movements, individua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Honisch, Juliane J. (Author), Elliott, Mark T. (Author), Jacoby, Nori (Contributor), Wing, Alan M. (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group, 2016-03-28T16:41:52Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02164 am a22002293u 4500
001 101887
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Honisch, Juliane J.  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Jacoby, Nori  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Elliott, Mark T.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jacoby, Nori  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wing, Alan M.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Cue properties change timing strategies in group movement synchronisation 
260 |b Nature Publishing Group,   |c 2016-03-28T16:41:52Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/101887 
520 |a To maintain synchrony in group activities, each individual within the group must continuously correct their movements to remain in time with the temporal cues available. Cues might originate from one or more members of the group. Current research suggests that when synchronising movements, individuals optimise their performance in terms of minimising variability of timing errors (asynchronies) between external cues and their own movements. However, the cost of this is an increase in the timing variability of their own movements. Here we investigate whether an individual's timing strategy changes according to the task, in a group scenario. To investigate this, we employed a novel paradigm that positioned six individuals to form two chains with common origin and termination on the circumference of a circle. We found that participants with access to timing cues from only one other member used a strategy to minimise their asynchrony variance. In contrast, the participant at the common termination of the two chains, who was required to integrate timing cues from two members, used a strategy that minimised movement variability. We conclude that humans are able to flexibly switch timekeeping strategies to maintain task demands and thus optimise the temporal performance of their movements. 
520 |a Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (EP/I031030/1) 
520 |a Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I031030/1) 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Scientific Reports