The Radical Flank Effect and Cross-occupational Collaboration for Technology Development during a Power Shift

This 12-month ethnographic study of an early entrant into the U.S. car-sharing industry demonstrates that when an organization shifts its focus from developing radical new technology to incrementally improving this technology, the shift may spark an internal power struggle between the dominant engin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Truelove, Emily Stecker (Contributor), Kellogg, Katherine C. (Contributor)
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sage Publications, 2017-02-10T16:23:57Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02018 am a22002053u 4500
001 106892
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Truelove, Emily Stecker  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Sloan School of Management  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Kellogg, Katherine C.  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Truelove, Emily Stecker  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Kellogg, Katherine C.  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Kellogg, Katherine C.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Radical Flank Effect and Cross-occupational Collaboration for Technology Development during a Power Shift 
260 |b Sage Publications,   |c 2017-02-10T16:23:57Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106892 
520 |a This 12-month ethnographic study of an early entrant into the U.S. car-sharing industry demonstrates that when an organization shifts its focus from developing radical new technology to incrementally improving this technology, the shift may spark an internal power struggle between the dominant engineering group and a challenger occupational group such as the marketing group. Analyzing 42 projects in two time periods that required collaboration between engineering and marketing during such a shift, we show how cross-occupational collaboration under these conditions can be facilitated by a radical flank threat, through which the bargaining power of moderates is strengthened by the presence of a more-radical group. In the face of a strong threat by radical members of a challenger occupational group, moderate members of the dominant engineering group may change their perceptions of their power to resist challengers' demands and begin to distinguish between the goals of radical versus more-moderate challengers. To maintain as much power as possible and prevent the more-dramatic change in engineering occupational goals demanded by radical challengers, moderate engineers may build a coalition with moderate challengers and collaborate for incremental technology development. 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Administrative Science Quarterly