An experimental study of bubble departure diameter in subcooled flow boiling including the effects of orientation angle, subcooling, mass flux, heat flux, and pressure

The effects of orientation angle, subcooling, heat flux, mass flux, and pressure on bubble departure diameter in the isolated bubble regime of subcooled flow boiling were studied by high-speed video in a two-phase flow loop that can accommodate a wide range of flow conditions. Specifically, the foll...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sugrue, Rosemary M (Contributor), Buongiorno, Jacopo (Contributor), McKrell, Thomas J (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier, 2017-04-13T19:15:41Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02722 am a22002533u 4500
001 108139
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sugrue, Rosemary M  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Buongiorno, Jacopo  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Sugrue, Rosemary M  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Buongiorno, Jacopo  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a McKrell, Thomas J  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Buongiorno, Jacopo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a McKrell, Thomas J  |e author 
245 0 0 |a An experimental study of bubble departure diameter in subcooled flow boiling including the effects of orientation angle, subcooling, mass flux, heat flux, and pressure 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2017-04-13T19:15:41Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108139 
520 |a The effects of orientation angle, subcooling, heat flux, mass flux, and pressure on bubble departure diameter in the isolated bubble regime of subcooled flow boiling were studied by high-speed video in a two-phase flow loop that can accommodate a wide range of flow conditions. Specifically, the following ranges were explored: orientation angles of 0° (downward-facing horizontal), 30°, 45°, 60°, 90° (vertical), and 180° (upward-facing horizontal); mass flux values of 250, 300, 350, and 400 kg/m2 s, corresponding to Froude numbers between 0.42 and 1.06; pressures of 101 (atmospheric), 202, and 505 kPa; two values of the subcooling degrees (10 and 20 °C); and two heat fluxes (0.05 and 0.10 MW/m2). The combination of the test section design, high-speed video camera and LED lighting results in high accuracy (order of 20 μm) in the determination of the bubble departure diameter. The data indicate that the bubble departure diameter increases with increasing heat flux, decreasing mass flux, decreasing subcooling, and decreasing pressure. Also, the bubble departure diameter increases with decreasing orientation angle, i.e. the largest bubbles are found to detach from a downward-facing horizontal surface. The mechanistic bubble departure diameter model of Klausner et al. and its recent modification by Yun et al. were found to correctly predict all the observed parametric trends, but with large average errors and standard deviation: 65.5 ± 75.8% for Klausner's and 37.9 ± 51.2% for Yun's. Since the cube of the bubble departure diameter is used in subcooled flow boiling heat transfer models, such large errors are clearly unacceptable, and underscore the need for more accurate bubble departure diameter models. 
520 |a Douglas C. Spreng Fund 
520 |a Nuclear Energy Institute 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Nuclear Engineering and Design