Optimization of Composite Fracture Properties: Method, Validation, and Applications

A paradigm in nature is to architect composites with excellent material properties compared to its constituents, which themselves often have contrasting mechanical behavior. Most engineering materials sacrifice strength for toughness, whereas natural materials do not face this tradeoff. However, bio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gu, Grace Xiang (Contributor), Dimas, Leon Sokratis Scheie (Contributor), Qin, Zhao (Contributor), Buehler, Markus J (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (Contributor), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ASME International, 2017-06-23T15:59:15Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02607 am a22002773u 4500
001 110212
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Gu, Grace Xiang  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Gu, Grace Xiang  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Dimas, Leon Sokratis Scheie  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Qin, Zhao  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Buehler, Markus J  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Dimas, Leon Sokratis Scheie  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Qin, Zhao  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Buehler, Markus J  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Optimization of Composite Fracture Properties: Method, Validation, and Applications 
260 |b ASME International,   |c 2017-06-23T15:59:15Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110212 
520 |a A paradigm in nature is to architect composites with excellent material properties compared to its constituents, which themselves often have contrasting mechanical behavior. Most engineering materials sacrifice strength for toughness, whereas natural materials do not face this tradeoff. However, biology's designs, adapted for organism survival, may have features not needed for some engineering applications. Here, we postulate that mimicking nature's elegant use of multimaterial phases can lead to better optimization of engineered materials. We employ an optimization algorithm to explore and design composites using soft and stiff building blocks to study the underlying mechanisms of nature's tough materials. For different applications, optimization parameters may vary. Validation of the algorithm is carried out using a test suite of cases without cracks to optimize for stiffness and compliance individually. A test case with a crack is also performed to optimize for toughness. The validation shows excellent agreement between geometries obtained from the optimization algorithm and the brute force method. This study uses different objective functions to optimize toughness, stiffness and toughness, and compliance and toughness. The algorithm presented here can provide researchers a way to tune material properties for a vast number of engineering problems by adjusting the distribution of soft and stiff materials. 
520 |a BASF. North American Center for Research on Advanced Materials 
520 |a American Society for Engineering Education. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Journal of Applied Mechanics