Full-Scale Turbofan Demonstration of a Deployable Engine Air-Brake for Drag Management Applications

• Main Authors: Pfeiffer, Gordon (Author), Davis, Rory (Author), Hartley, Thomas (Author), Shah, Parthiv N. (Contributor), Spakovszky, Zoltan S (Contributor)
• Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Contributor), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering (Contributor)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: ASME International, 2018-07-23T17:18:40Z.
• Subjects: Article
• Online Access: Get fulltext

 This paper presents the design and full-scale ground-test demonstration of an engine airbrake (EAB) nozzle that uses a deployable swirl vane mechanism to switch the operation of a turbofan's exhaust stream from thrust generation to drag generation during the approach and/or descent phase of flight. The EAB generates a swirling outflow from the turbofan exhaust nozzle, allowing an aircraft to generate equivalent drag in the form of thrust reduction at a fixed fan rotor speed. The drag generated by the swirling exhaust flow is sustained by the strong radial pressure gradient created by the EAB swirl vanes. Such drag-on-demand is an enabler to operational benefits such as slower, steeper, and/ or aeroacoustically cleaner flight on approach, addressing the aviation community's need for active and passive control of aeroacoustic noise sources and access to confined airports. Using NASA's technology readiness level (TRL) definitions, the EAB technology has been matured to a level of six, i.e., a fully functional prototype. The TRL-maturation effort involved design, fabrication, assembly, and ground-testing of the EAB's deployable mechanism on a full-scale, mixed-exhaust, medium-bypass-ratio business jet engine (Williams International FJ44-4A) operating at the upper end of typical approach throttle settings. The final prototype design satisfied a set of critical technology demonstration requirements that included (1) aerodynamic equivalent drag production equal to 15% of nominal thrust in a high-powered approach throttle setting (called dirty approach), (2) excess nozzle flow capacity and fuel burn reduction in the fully deployed configuration, (3) acceptable engine operability during dynamic deployment and stowing, (4) deployment time of 3-5 s, (5) stowing time under 0.5 s, and (6) packaging of the mechanism within a notional engine cowl. For a typical twin-jet aircraft application, a constantspeed, steep approach analysis suggests that the EAB drag could be used without additional external airframe drag to increase the conventional glideslope from 3 deg to 4.3 deg, with about 3 dB noise reduction at a fixed observer location.