Framework for rational donor selection in fecal microbiota transplant clinical trials

Early clinical successes are driving enthusiasm for fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), the transfer of healthy gut bacteria through whole stool, as emerging research is linking the microbiome to many different diseases. However, preliminary trials have yielded mixed results and suggest that het...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duvallet, Claire (Author), Panchal, Pratik (Author), Budree, Shrish (Author), Osman, Majdi (Author), Alm, Eric J (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineering (Contributor), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2020-03-30T19:27:43Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02534 am a22002653u 4500
001 124427
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Duvallet, Claire  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineering  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Panchal, Pratik  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Budree, Shrish  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Osman, Majdi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alm, Eric J  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Framework for rational donor selection in fecal microbiota transplant clinical trials 
260 |b Public Library of Science (PLoS),   |c 2020-03-30T19:27:43Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124427 
520 |a Early clinical successes are driving enthusiasm for fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), the transfer of healthy gut bacteria through whole stool, as emerging research is linking the microbiome to many different diseases. However, preliminary trials have yielded mixed results and suggest that heterogeneity in donor stool may play a role in patient response. Thus, clinical trials may fail because an ineffective donor was chosen rather than because FMT is not appropriate for the indication. Here, we describe a conceptual framework to guide rational donor selection to increase the likelihood that FMT clinical trials will succeed. We argue that the mechanism by which the microbiome is hypothesized to be associated with a given indication should inform how healthy donors are selected for FMT trials, categorizing these mechanisms into four disease models and presenting associated donor selection strategies. We next walk through examples based on previously published FMT trials and ongoing investigations to illustrate how donor selection might occur in practice. Finally, we show that typical FMT trials are not powered to discover individual taxa mediating patient responses, suggesting that clinicians should develop targeted hypotheses for retrospective analyses and design their clinical trials accordingly. Moving forward, developing and applying novel clinical trial design methodologies like rational donor selection will be necessary to ensure that FMT successfully translates into clinical impact. 
546 |a en 
690 |a General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 
690 |a General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 
690 |a General Medicine 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.1371/journal.pone.0222881 
773 |t PloS one