Learning physical parameters from dynamic scenes

Humans acquire their most basic physical concepts early in development, and continue to enrich and expand their intuitive physics throughout life as they are exposed to more and varied dynamical environments. We introduce a hierarchical Bayesian framework to explain how people can learn physical par...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ullman, Tomer D. (Author), Stuhlmüller, Andreas (Author), Goodman, Noah D. (Author), Tenenbaum, Joshua B. (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier BV, 2020-05-01T13:44:01Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02378 am a22002173u 4500
001 124969
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ullman, Tomer D.  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Stuhlmüller, Andreas  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Goodman, Noah D.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tenenbaum, Joshua B.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Learning physical parameters from dynamic scenes 
260 |b Elsevier BV,   |c 2020-05-01T13:44:01Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124969 
520 |a Humans acquire their most basic physical concepts early in development, and continue to enrich and expand their intuitive physics throughout life as they are exposed to more and varied dynamical environments. We introduce a hierarchical Bayesian framework to explain how people can learn physical parameters at multiple levels. In contrast to previous Bayesian models of theory acquisition (Tenenbaum, Kemp, Griffiths, & Goodman, 2011), we work with more expressive probabilistic program representations suitable for learning the forces and properties that govern how objects interact in dynamic scenes unfolding over time. We compare our model to human learners on a challenging task of estimating multiple physical parameters in novel microworlds given short movies. This task requires people to reason simultaneously about multiple interacting physical laws and properties. People are generally able to learn in this setting and are consistent in their judgments. Yet they also make systematic errors indicative of the approximations people might make in solving this computationally demanding problem with limited computational resources. We propose two approximations that complement the top-down Bayesian approach. One approximation model relies on a more bottom-up feature-based inference scheme. The second approximation combines the strengths of the bottom-up and top-down approaches, by taking the feature-based inference as its point of departure for a search in physical-parameter space. Keywords: Learning; Intuitive physics; Probabilistic inference; Physical reasoning; Intuitive theory 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant CCF-1231216) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant N00014-13-1-0333) 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Cognitive Psychology