Market selection

The hypothesis that financial markets punish traders who make relatively inaccurate forecasts and eventually eliminate the effect of their beliefs on prices is of fundamental importance to the standard modeling paradigm in asset pricing. We establish straightforward necessary and sufficient conditio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kogan, Leonid (Author), Ross, Stephen A. (Author), Wang, Jiang (Author), Westerfield, Mark M. (Author)
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier BV, 2020-10-02T14:47:45Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01218 am a22001933u 4500
001 127794
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kogan, Leonid  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Sloan School of Management  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Ross, Stephen A.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wang, Jiang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Westerfield, Mark M.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Market selection 
260 |b Elsevier BV,   |c 2020-10-02T14:47:45Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127794 
520 |a The hypothesis that financial markets punish traders who make relatively inaccurate forecasts and eventually eliminate the effect of their beliefs on prices is of fundamental importance to the standard modeling paradigm in asset pricing. We establish straightforward necessary and sufficient conditions for agents to survive and to affect prices in the long run in a general setting with minimal restrictions on endowments, beliefs, or utility functions. We describe a new mechanism for the distinction between survival and price impact in a broad class of economies. Our results cover economies with time-separable utility functions, including possibly state-dependent preferences. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Journal of Economic Theory