Planning beyond Mass Incarceration

The policing and penal systems play an oversized role in shaping the built environment and budgets of cities, alongside the lives of urban residents. Law enforcement systems are also deeply inequitable with poor residents, and communities of color disproportionately harmed by the violences of the sy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simpson, Sheryl-Ann (Author), Steil, Justin P (Author), Mehta, Aditi (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications, 2020-10-29T21:08:28Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01788 am a22001813u 4500
001 128259
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Simpson, Sheryl-Ann  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Steil, Justin P  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mehta, Aditi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Planning beyond Mass Incarceration 
260 |b SAGE Publications,   |c 2020-10-29T21:08:28Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128259 
520 |a The policing and penal systems play an oversized role in shaping the built environment and budgets of cities, alongside the lives of urban residents. Law enforcement systems are also deeply inequitable with poor residents, and communities of color disproportionately harmed by the violences of the system. Planning's contribution to the creation of durable spatial stratification in the built environment implicates planning in the class and race disparities in law enforcement systems. Planning research and theory has also supported this inequity by largely neglecting the relationships between policing and penal systems and planning. The articles in this volume address this neglect and employ a wide variety of core theories, methods, and methodologies from planning to engage with the relationships between planning and law enforcement. The articles are connected through attention to racial justice including analyzing moments where planning supported and produced injustice, and identifying opportunities to support greater equity, decarceration and even abolition where planning practice, education and research support the creation of systems of safety and care beyond mass incarceration. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Journal of Planning Education and Research