|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01807 am a22001693u 4500 |
001 |
128654 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Tulsyan, Aditya
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Process Systems Engineering Laboratory
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Barton, Paul I
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Interval enclosures for reachable sets of chemical kinetic flow systems. Part 3: Indirect-bounding method
|
260 |
|
|
|b Elsevier BV,
|c 2020-11-25T15:30:12Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128654
|
520 |
|
|
|a In the third paper, in the three-part series, we propose an indirect-bounding approach for constructing rigorous interval enclosures or bounds for the reachable sets of CSTR reaction systems subject to parametric and initial condition uncertainties and flow rate disturbances. Existing comparison-based methods yield conservative enclosures for the reachable sets due to the non-quasi-monotonic and non-cooperative nature of CSTR reaction systems. The proposed indirect-bounding method addresses the overestimation problem by using the isomorphic transformation, developed in Tulsyan and Barton (2017a), to map the system into a transformed state space, where comparison-based methods yield tight bounds. The interval bounds on the original states are then reconstructed using the inverse transformation. This eliminates the need to know a priori an effective enclosure set for the CSTR reaction system, as required by the direct-bounding method in Tulsyan and Barton (2017b). The efficacy of the indirect-bounding method is validated on several example problems. Several comparisons with the direct-bounding method are also presented to demonstrate the improvements achieved with the indirect-bounding method.
|
546 |
|
|
|a en
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t Chemical Engineering Science
|