Automatic Modeling of Dominance Effects Using Granger Causality

We propose the use of Granger Causality to model the effects that dominant people induce on the other participants' behavioral patterns during small group interactions. We test the proposed approach on a dataset of brainstorming and problem solving tasks collected using the sociometric badges&#...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kalimeri, Kyriaki (Author), Lepri, Bruno (Author), Kim, Taemie Jung (Author), Pianesi, Fabio (Author), Pentland, Alexander (Sandy) (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2022-01-06T14:41:08Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01916 am a22002053u 4500
001 137881.2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kalimeri, Kyriaki  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Lepri, Bruno  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kim, Taemie Jung  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pianesi, Fabio  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pentland, Alexander   |q  (Sandy)   |e author 
245 0 0 |a Automatic Modeling of Dominance Effects Using Granger Causality 
260 |b Springer Berlin Heidelberg,   |c 2022-01-06T14:41:08Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/137881.2 
520 |a We propose the use of Granger Causality to model the effects that dominant people induce on the other participants' behavioral patterns during small group interactions. We test the proposed approach on a dataset of brainstorming and problem solving tasks collected using the sociometric badges' accelerometers. The expectation that more dominant people have generalized higher influence is not borne out; however some more nuanced patterns emerge. In the first place, more dominant people tend to behave differently according to the nature of the task: during brainstorming they engage in complex relations where they simultaneously play the role of influencer and of influencee, whereas during problem solving they tend to be influenced by less dominant people. Moreover, dominant people adopt a complementarity stance, increasing or decreasing their body activity in an opposite manner to their influencers. On the other hand, less dominant people react (almost) as frequently with mimicry as with complementary. Finally, we can also see that the overall level of influence in a group can be associated with the group's performance, in particular for problem solving task. © 2011 Springer-Verlag. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.1007/978-3-642-25446-8_14