Evaluation of individual and ensemble probabilistic forecasts of COVID-19 mortality in the United States

<jats:title>Significance</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper compares the probabilistic accuracy of short-term forecasts of reported deaths due to COVID-19 during the first year and a half of the pandemic in the United States. Results show high variation in accuracy between and within...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shah, Devavrat (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2022-07-20T14:06:59Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01281 am a22001573u 4500
001 143879
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shah, Devavrat  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of individual and ensemble probabilistic forecasts of COVID-19 mortality in the United States 
260 |b Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,   |c 2022-07-20T14:06:59Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/143879 
520 |a <jats:title>Significance</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper compares the probabilistic accuracy of short-term forecasts of reported deaths due to COVID-19 during the first year and a half of the pandemic in the United States. Results show high variation in accuracy between and within stand-alone models and more consistent accuracy from an ensemble model that combined forecasts from all eligible models. This demonstrates that an ensemble model provided a reliable and comparatively accurate means of forecasting deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic that exceeded the performance of all of the models that contributed to it. This work strengthens the evidence base for synthesizing multiple models to support public-health action.</jats:p> 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.1073/pnas.2113561119 
773 |t Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences