|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01639 am a22003133u 4500 |
001 |
51736 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Emig, Thorsten
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Theoretical Physics
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Jaffe, Robert L.
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Jaffe, Robert L.
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kardar, Mehran
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Emig, Thorsten
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Graham, Noah
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Jaffe, Robert L.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kardar, Mehran
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Orientation dependence of Casimir forces
|
260 |
|
|
|b American Physical Society,
|c 2010-02-12T13:39:53Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/51736
|
520 |
|
|
|a The Casimir interaction between two objects, or between an object and a plane, depends on their relative orientations. We make these angular dependences explicit by considering prolate or oblate spheroids. The variation with orientation is calculated exactly at asymptotically large distances for the electromagnetic field and at arbitrary separations for a scalar field. For a spheroid in front of a mirror, the leading term is orientation independent, and we find the optimal orientation from computations at higher order.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Department of Energy
|
520 |
|
|
|a Research Corporation
|
520 |
|
|
|a National Science Foundation
|
520 |
|
|
|a DFG
|
546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t Physical Review A
|