|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02270 am a22002413u 4500 |
001 |
58304 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kaufman-Halman, Tali
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kaufman-Halman, Tali
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kaufman-Halman, Tali
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Xie, Ning
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Litsyn, Simon
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Xie, Ning
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Breaking the epsilon-Soundness Bound of the Linearity Test over Gf(2)
|
246 |
3 |
3 |
|a BREAKING THE ε-SOUNDNESS BOUND OF THE LINEARITY TEST OVER GF(2)
|
260 |
|
|
|b Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics,
|c 2010-09-03T14:48:57Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58304
|
520 |
|
|
|a For Boolean functions that are $\epsilon$-far from the set of linear functions, we study the lower bound on the rejection probability (denoted by REJ(epsilon) of the linearity test suggested by Blum, Luby, and Rubinfeld [J. Comput. System Sci., 47 (1993), pp. 549-595]. This problem is arguably the most fundamental and extensively studied problem in property testing of Boolean functions. The previously best bounds for REJ(epsilon) were obtained by Bellare et al. [IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 42 (1996), pp. 1781-1795]. They used Fourier analysis to show that REJ(epsilon)[geq]epsilon for every 0[leq]epsilon [leq]1/2. They also conjectured that this bound might not be tight for epsilon's which are close to 1/2. In this paper we show that this indeed is the case. Specifically, we improve the lower bound of REJ(epsilon)[geq]epsilon by an additive constant that depends only on epsilon: REJ(epsilon)[geq] epsilon+min{1376epsilon[superscript 3](1-2epsilon)[superscript 12],[frac 1 over 4epsilon(1-2epsilon[superscript 4]}, for every 0[leq]epsilon[leq]1/2. Our analysis is based on a relationship between REJ(epsilon) and the weight distribution of a coset code of the Hadamard code. We use both Fourier analysis and coding theory tools to estimate this weight distribution.
|
546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t SIAM Journal of Computing
|