Space-optimal Heavy Hitters with Strong Error Bounds

The problem of finding heavy hitters and approximating the frequencies of items is at the heart of many problems in data stream analysis. It has been observed that several proposed solutions to this problem can outperform their worst-case guarantees on real data. This leads to the question of whethe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Berinde, Radu (Contributor), Indyk, Piotr (Contributor), Cormode, Graham (Author), Strauss, Martin J. (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2012-09-17T18:08:06Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02797 am a22002653u 4500
001 73015
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Berinde, Radu  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Indyk, Piotr  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Berinde, Radu  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Indyk, Piotr  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Indyk, Piotr  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cormode, Graham  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Strauss, Martin J.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Space-optimal Heavy Hitters with Strong Error Bounds 
260 |b Association for Computing Machinery (ACM),   |c 2012-09-17T18:08:06Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73015 
520 |a The problem of finding heavy hitters and approximating the frequencies of items is at the heart of many problems in data stream analysis. It has been observed that several proposed solutions to this problem can outperform their worst-case guarantees on real data. This leads to the question of whether some stronger bounds can be guaranteed. We answer this in the positive by showing that a class of "counter-based algorithms" (including the popular and very space-efficient FREQUENT and SPACESAVING algorithms) provide much stronger approximation guarantees than previously known. Specifically, we show that errors in the approximation of individual elements do not depend on the frequencies of the most frequent elements, but only on the frequency of the remaining "tail." This shows that counter-based methods are the most space-efficient (in fact, space-optimal) algorithms having this strong error bound. This tail guarantee allows these algorithms to solve the "sparse recovery" problem. Here, the goal is to recover a faithful representation of the vector of frequencies, f. We prove that using space O(k), the algorithms construct an approximation f* to the frequency vector f so that the L1 error ||f -- f*||[subscript 1] is close to the best possible error min[subscript f2] ||f2 -- f||[subscript 1], where f2 ranges over all vectors with at most k non-zero entries. This improves the previously best known space bound of about O(k log n) for streams without element deletions (where n is the size of the domain from which stream elements are drawn). Other consequences of the tail guarantees are results for skewed (Zipfian) data, and guarantees for accuracy of merging multiple summarized streams. 
520 |a David & Lucile Packard Foundation (Fellowship) 
520 |a Center for Massive Data Algorithmics (MADALGO) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.). (Grant number CCF-0728645) 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Proceedings of the twenty-eighth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems (PODS '09)