Sociology, Street-Level Bureaucracy, and the Management of the Public Sector

This article extends the concept of street-level bureaucracy to address the problem of the inflexibility and rigidity of governmental rules and regulations, a problem at the heart of the standard economic argument against an active government role in the management of the economy. In so doing, it se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Piore, Michael J. (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Pubishers, 2012-11-08T15:45:46Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01970 am a22001933u 4500
001 74597
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Piore, Michael J.  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Piore, Michael J.  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Piore, Michael J.  |e contributor 
245 0 0 |a Sociology, Street-Level Bureaucracy, and the Management of the Public Sector 
246 3 3 |a Beyond Markets: Sociology, street-level bureaucracy, and the management of the public sector 
260 |b Wiley-Blackwell Pubishers,   |c 2012-11-08T15:45:46Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/74597 
520 |a This article extends the concept of street-level bureaucracy to address the problem of the inflexibility and rigidity of governmental rules and regulations, a problem at the heart of the standard economic argument against an active government role in the management of the economy. In so doing, it seeks to create a conceptual bridge over which a range of social science disciplines can be drawn into the debate about public sector management and thereby expand the repertoire of policy tools. The article draws primarily on research on one class of street-level bureaucratic organizations, labor inspection organizations in Latin America and southern Europe, and secondarily on a project focusing on DARPA, the research arm of the US Department of Defense. In both organizations, line officers have wide discretion in program development and management and in effect adjust to changing economic and social conditions in a way not unlike the market. These adjustments are grounded in tacit rules that evolve through discussion among the line agents coping day-to-day with novel cases. Management can influence that evolution by entering into the ongoing discussion and giving it direction. Various ways in which it might do so are examined. 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Regulation and Governance