|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01457 am a22002173u 4500 |
| 001 |
75030 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Cowan, Ray Franklin
|e author
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science
|e contributor
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Cowan, Ray Franklin
|e contributor
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Dujmic, Denis
|e contributor
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sciolla, Gabriella
|e contributor
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Dujmic, Denis
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sciolla, Gabriella
|e author
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Evidence for an Excess of B̅ →D[superscript (*)]τ[superscript -]ν̅ [subscript τ] Decays
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b American Physical Society,
|c 2012-11-26T20:37:00Z.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75030
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Based on the full BABAR data sample, we report improved measurements of the ratios R(D[superscript(*)])=B(B̅→D[superscript (*)][bar over τ]ν̅[subscript τ])/B(B̅→D[superscript (*)]ℓ[subscript bar over ℓ]ν̅[subscript ℓ]), where ℓ is either e or μ. These ratios are sensitive to new physics contributions in the form of a charged Higgs boson. We measure R(D)=0.440±0.058±0.042 and R(D*)=0.332±0.024±0.018, which exceed the standard model expectations by 2.0σ and 2.7σ, respectively. Taken together, our results disagree with these expectations at the 3.4σ level. This excess cannot be explained by a charged Higgs boson in the type II two-Higgs-doublet model.
|
| 546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
| 655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Physical Review Letters
|
