Eye Movements Modulate the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Word Processing

Active reading requires coordination between frequent eye movements (saccades) and short fixations in text. Yet, the impact of saccades on word processing remains unknown, as neuroimaging studies typically employ constant eye fixation. Here we investigate eye-movement effects on word recognition pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Temereanca, Simona (Contributor), Hamalainen, Matti S. (Contributor), Kuperberg, Gina R. (Author), Stufflebeam, Steven M. (Contributor), Halgren, Eric (Author), Brown, Emery N. (Contributor)
Other Authors: Harvard University- (Contributor), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Neuroscience, 2012-12-10T16:12:04Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
Description
Summary:Active reading requires coordination between frequent eye movements (saccades) and short fixations in text. Yet, the impact of saccades on word processing remains unknown, as neuroimaging studies typically employ constant eye fixation. Here we investigate eye-movement effects on word recognition processes in healthy human subjects using anatomically constrained magnetoencephalography, psychophysical measurements, and saccade detection in real time. Word recognition was slower and brain responses were reduced to words presented early versus late after saccades, suggesting an overall transient impairment of word processing after eye movements. Response reductions occurred early in visual cortices and later in language regions, where they colocalized with repetition priming effects. Qualitatively similar effects occurred when words appeared early versus late after background movement that mimicked saccades, suggesting that retinal motion contributes to postsaccadic inhibition. Further, differences in postsaccadic and background-movement effects suggest that central mechanisms also contribute to postsaccadic modulation. Together, these results suggest a complex interplay between visual and central saccadic mechanisms during reading.
National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant HD050627)
National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant EB006385)
National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant DP1 OD003646)
National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant EB009048)
National Center for Research Resources (U.S.) (Grant P41 RR14075)
Massachusetts General Hospital (Claflin Distinguished Scholars Award)