|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01722 am a22002053u 4500 |
001 |
77944 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Yuan, Jing
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Yuan, Jing
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Madsen, Ole S.
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Madsen, Ole S.
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a On the choice of random wave simulation in the surf zone processes
|
260 |
|
|
|b Coastal Engineering Research Council,
|c 2013-03-20T13:45:39Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77944
|
520 |
|
|
|a In this paper, the two common approaches to account for wave randomness, the spectral approach and the wave-by-wave approach, are compared through numerical experiments conducted with the coupling of a surf zone hydrodynamic model and a bedload sediment transport model. Special attention is paid to the wave nonlinearity and net cross-shore bedload transport predictions. The two approaches are found to have negligible difference in their predictions of certain average hydrodynamics, such as wave heights, set-up and undertow. However, the wave-by-wave approach outperforms the spectral approach in the wave nonlinearity prediction, and the two approaches differ significantly in their predictions of wave-induced net cross-shore bedload transport which strongly depends on wave nonlinearity. This suggests the necessity of using the wave-by-wave approach. The computational efficiency of the wave-by-wave approach is also discussed.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Singapore-MIT Alliance. Center for Environmental Sensing and Monitoring
|
546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t Proceedings of 32nd Conference on Coastal Engineering
|