On the choice of random wave simulation in the surf zone processes

In this paper, the two common approaches to account for wave randomness, the spectral approach and the wave-by-wave approach, are compared through numerical experiments conducted with the coupling of a surf zone hydrodynamic model and a bedload sediment transport model. Special attention is paid to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuan, Jing (Contributor), Madsen, Ole S. (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Coastal Engineering Research Council, 2013-03-20T13:45:39Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01722 am a22002053u 4500
001 77944
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Yuan, Jing  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Yuan, Jing  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Madsen, Ole S.  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Madsen, Ole S.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a On the choice of random wave simulation in the surf zone processes 
260 |b Coastal Engineering Research Council,   |c 2013-03-20T13:45:39Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77944 
520 |a In this paper, the two common approaches to account for wave randomness, the spectral approach and the wave-by-wave approach, are compared through numerical experiments conducted with the coupling of a surf zone hydrodynamic model and a bedload sediment transport model. Special attention is paid to the wave nonlinearity and net cross-shore bedload transport predictions. The two approaches are found to have negligible difference in their predictions of certain average hydrodynamics, such as wave heights, set-up and undertow. However, the wave-by-wave approach outperforms the spectral approach in the wave nonlinearity prediction, and the two approaches differ significantly in their predictions of wave-induced net cross-shore bedload transport which strongly depends on wave nonlinearity. This suggests the necessity of using the wave-by-wave approach. The computational efficiency of the wave-by-wave approach is also discussed. 
520 |a Singapore-MIT Alliance. Center for Environmental Sensing and Monitoring 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Proceedings of 32nd Conference on Coastal Engineering