A Complete Characterization of the Gap between Convexity and SOS-Convexity

Our first contribution in this paper is to prove that three natural sum of squares (sos) based sufficient conditions for convexity of polynomials, via the definition of convexity, its first order characterization, and its second order characterization, are equivalent. These three equivalent algebrai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmadi, Amir Ali (Author), Parrilo, Pablo A. (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (Contributor), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2013-10-18T16:46:39Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02606 am a22002053u 4500
001 81433
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ahmadi, Amir Ali  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Parrilo, Pablo A.  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Parrilo, Pablo A.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Complete Characterization of the Gap between Convexity and SOS-Convexity 
260 |b Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics,   |c 2013-10-18T16:46:39Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81433 
520 |a Our first contribution in this paper is to prove that three natural sum of squares (sos) based sufficient conditions for convexity of polynomials, via the definition of convexity, its first order characterization, and its second order characterization, are equivalent. These three equivalent algebraic conditions, henceforth referred to as sos-convexity, can be checked by semidefinite programming, whereas deciding convexity is NP-hard. If we denote the set of convex and sos-convex polynomials in $n$ variables of degree $d$ with $\tilde{C}_{n,d}$ and $\tilde{\Sigma C}_{n,d}$ respectively, then our main contribution is to prove that $\tilde{C}_{n,d}=\tilde{\Sigma C}_{n,d}$ if and only if $n=1$ or $d=2$ or $(n,d)=(2,4)$. We also present a complete characterization for forms (homogeneous polynomials) except for the case $(n,d)=(3,4)$, which is joint work with Blekherman and is to be published elsewhere. Our result states that the set $C_{n,d}$ of convex forms in $n$ variables of degree $d$ equals the set $\Sigma C_{n,d}$ of sos-convex forms if and only if $n=2$ or $d=2$ or $(n,d)=(3,4)$. To prove these results, we present in particular explicit examples of polynomials in $\tilde{C}_{2,6}\setminus\tilde{\Sigma C}_{2,6}$ and $\tilde{C}_{3,4}\setminus\tilde{\Sigma C}_{3,4}$ and forms in $C_{3,6}\setminus\Sigma C_{3,6}$ and $C_{4,4}\setminus\Sigma C_{4,4,}$ and a general procedure for constructing forms in $C_{n,d+2}\setminus\Sigma C_{n,d+2}$ from nonnegative but not sos forms in $n$ variables and degree $d$. Although for disparate reasons, the remarkable outcome is that convex polynomials (resp., forms) are sos-convex exactly in cases where nonnegative polynomials (resp., forms) are sums of squares, as characterized by Hilbert. 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant DMS-0757207) 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t SIAM Journal on Optimization