|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02782 am a22003013u 4500 |
001 |
81456 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Bullo, Francesco
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Frazzoli, Emilio
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Savla, Ketan D.
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Pavone, M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Smith, S. L.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Frazzoli, Emilio
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Savla, Ketan D.
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Dynamic Vehicle Routing for Robotic Systems
|
260 |
|
|
|b Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE),
|c 2013-10-21T16:14:45Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81456
|
520 |
|
|
|a Recent years have witnessed great advancements in the science and technology of autonomy, robotics, and networking. This paper surveys recent concepts and algorithms for dynamic vehicle routing (DVR), that is, for the automatic planning of optimal multivehicle routes to perform tasks that are generated over time by an exogenous process. We consider a rich variety of scenarios relevant for robotic applications. We begin by reviewing the basic DVR problem: demands for service arrive at random locations at random times and a vehicle travels to provide on-site service while minimizing the expected wait time of the demands. Next, we treat different multivehicle scenarios based on different models for demands (e.g., demands with different priority levels and impatient demands), vehicles (e.g., motion constraints, communication, and sensing capabilities), and tasks. The performance criterion used in these scenarios is either the expected wait time of the demands or the fraction of demands serviced successfully. In each specific DVR scenario, we adopt a rigorous technical approach that relies upon methods from queueing theory, combinatorial optimization, and stochastic geometry. First, we establish fundamental limits on the achievable performance, including limits on stability and quality of service. Second, we design algorithms, and provide provable guarantees on their performance with respect to the fundamental limits.
|
520 |
|
|
|a United States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Award FA 8650-07-2-3744)
|
520 |
|
|
|a United States. Army Research Office. Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (Award W911NF-05-1-0219)
|
520 |
|
|
|a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Award ECCS-0705451)
|
520 |
|
|
|a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Award CMMI-0705453)
|
520 |
|
|
|a United States. Army Research Office (Award W911NF-11-1-0092)
|
546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t Proceedings of the IEEE
|