A DNA Damage-Induced, SOS-Independent Checkpoint Regulates Cell Division in Caulobacter crescentus

Cells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Cauloba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Modell, Joshua W. (Contributor), Kambara, Tracy K. (Contributor), Perchuk, Barrett (Contributor), Laub, Michael T (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology (Contributor), Laub, Michael T. (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science, 2014-12-23T18:11:06Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02192 am a22002653u 4500
001 92472
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Modell, Joshua W.  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Modell, Joshua W.  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Kambara, Tracy K.  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Perchuk, Barrett  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Laub, Michael T.  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Kambara, Tracy K.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Perchuk, Barrett  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Laub, Michael T  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A DNA Damage-Induced, SOS-Independent Checkpoint Regulates Cell Division in Caulobacter crescentus 
260 |b Public Library of Science,   |c 2014-12-23T18:11:06Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92472 
520 |a Cells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division, especially during episodes of DNA damage. The paradigm for cell division control following DNA damage in bacteria involves the SOS response where cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA induces a division inhibitor. However, in Caulobacter crescentus, cells lacking the primary SOS-regulated inhibitor, sidA, can often still delay division post-damage. Here we identify didA, a second cell division inhibitor that is induced by DNA damage, but in an SOS-independent manner. Together, DidA and SidA inhibit division, such that cells lacking both inhibitors divide prematurely following DNA damage, with lethal consequences. We show that DidA does not disrupt assembly of the division machinery and instead binds the essential division protein FtsN to block cytokinesis. Intriguingly, mutations in FtsW and FtsI, which drive the synthesis of septal cell wall material, can suppress the activity of both SidA and DidA, likely by causing the FtsW/I/N complex to hyperactively initiate cell division. Finally, we identify a transcription factor, DriD, that drives the SOS-independent transcription of didA following DNA damage. 
520 |a National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant R01GM082899) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.). Graduate Research Fellowship Program 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t PLoS Biology