Technology Readiness Levels at 40: a study of state-of-the-art use, challenges, and opportunities

The technology readiness level (TRL) scale was introduced by NASA in the 1970s as a tool for assessing the maturity of technologies during complex system development. TRL data have been used to make multi-million dollar technology management decisions in programs such as NASA's Mars Curiosity R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olechowski, Alison (Author), Eppinger, Steven D. (Author), Joglekar, Nitin (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SSRN, 2015-04-01T16:21:25Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02100 am a22002413u 4500
001 96307
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Olechowski, Alison  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eppinger, Steven D.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Joglekar, Nitin  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Technology Readiness Levels at 40: a study of state-of-the-art use, challenges, and opportunities 
260 |b SSRN,   |c 2015-04-01T16:21:25Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96307 
520 |a The technology readiness level (TRL) scale was introduced by NASA in the 1970s as a tool for assessing the maturity of technologies during complex system development. TRL data have been used to make multi-million dollar technology management decisions in programs such as NASA's Mars Curiosity Rover. This scale is now a de facto standard used for technology assessment and oversight in many industries, from power systems to consumer electronics. Low TRLs have been associated with significantly reduced timeliness and increased costs across a portfolio of US Department of Defense programs. However, anecdotal evidence raises concerns about many of the practices related to TRLs. We study TRL implementations based on semi-structured interviews with employees from seven different organizations and examine documentation collected from industry standards and organizational guidelines related to technology development and demonstration. Our findings consist of 15 challenges observed in TRL implementations that fall into three different categories: system complexity, planning and review, and validity of assessment. We explore research opportunities for these challenges and posit that addressing these opportunities, either singly or in groups, could improve decision processes and performance outcomes in complex engineering projects. 
546 |a en_US 
690 |a Technology assessment 
690 |a Technology readiness 
690 |a Engineering management 
690 |a R&D management 
690 |a Project management 
690 |a Risk management 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;5127-15