Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization: Approximation Algorithms and Other Generalizations

It was recently shown in [12] that revenue optimization can be computationally efficiently reduced to welfare optimization in all multi-dimensional Bayesian auction problems with arbitrary (possibly combinatorial) feasibility constraints and independent additive bidders with arbitrary (possibly comb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cai, Yang (Contributor), Daskalakis, Konstantinos (Contributor), Weinberg, Seth Matthew (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2015-11-20T17:11:02Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02498 am a22002773u 4500
001 99957
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Cai, Yang  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Cai, Yang  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Daskalakis, Konstantinos  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Weinberg, Seth Matthew  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Daskalakis, Konstantinos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Weinberg, Seth Matthew  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization: Approximation Algorithms and Other Generalizations 
260 |b Association for Computing Machinery (ACM),   |c 2015-11-20T17:11:02Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99957 
520 |a It was recently shown in [12] that revenue optimization can be computationally efficiently reduced to welfare optimization in all multi-dimensional Bayesian auction problems with arbitrary (possibly combinatorial) feasibility constraints and independent additive bidders with arbitrary (possibly combinatorial) demand constraints. This reduction provides a poly-time solution to the optimal mechanism design problem in all auction settings where welfare optimization can be solved efficiently, but it is fragile to approximation and cannot provide solutions to settings where welfare maximization can only be tractably approximated. In this paper, we extend the reduction to accommodate approximation algorithms, providing an approximation preserving reduction from (truthful) revenue maximization to (not necessarily truthful) welfare maximization. The mechanisms output by our reduction choose allocations via black-box calls to welfare approximation on randomly selected inputs, thereby generalizing also our earlier structural results on optimal multi-dimensional mechanisms to approximately optimal mechanisms. Unlike [12], our results here are obtained through novel uses of the Ellipsoid algorithm and other optimization techniques over non-convex regions. 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (CAREER Award CCF-0953960) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Award CCF-1101491) 
520 |a Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Fellowship) 
520 |a Microsoft Research (Faculty Fellowship) 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.). Graduate Research Fellowship 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA '13)