Family Implicit Rules, Shame, and Adolescent Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors

• Main Author: Crane, Jeffrey Paul
• Format: Others
• Published: BYU ScholarsArchive 2013
• Subjects: family implicit rules; shame; prosocial behavior; antisocial behavior; Marriage and Family Therapy and Counseling
• Online Access: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4163; https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5162&context=etd

This exploratory cross-sectional study examined the relationship between implicit family process rules and adolescent prosocial and antisocial communication behaviors. Data came from two-parent families in wave 5 of the Flourishing Families project which consisted of 322 families (fathers, mothers and children ages 13-17). Both observational and questionnaire data were used in data collection. Prosocial and antisocial behaviors were assessed using observational codes from the Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales (Melby, et al., 1998). Each of the family members' perceptions were used to assess constraining family rules and facilitative family rules. Findings showed a direct positive relationship between facilitative family process rules and pro-social communication and a negative relationship with antisocial communication. Constraining family process rules were also positively related to antisocial communication behaviors in adolescents. Shame was a significant mediator of the relationship between facilitative family rules and prosocial behavior as well as between constraining family rules and antisocial behavior. Implications for family therapy practice are discussed.