Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries

Yes === Objective: To develop a model of the psychological factors which predict people’s intention to adopt personalised nutrition. Potential determinants of adoption included perceived risk and benefit, perceived self-efficacy, internal locus of control and health commitment. Methods: A questio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Poinhos, R., van der Lans, I.A., Rankin, A., Fischer, A.R.H., Bunting, B.P., Kuznesof, S., Stewart-Knox, Barbara, Frewer, L.J.
Language:en
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10454/6721
id ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-6721
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BRADFORD-oai-bradscholars.brad.ac.uk-10454-67212019-08-31T03:03:21Z Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries Poinhos, R. van der Lans, I.A. Rankin, A. Fischer, A.R.H. Bunting, B.P. Kuznesof, S. Stewart-Knox, Barbara Frewer, L.J. Personalised nutrition Europe Consumer attitudes Yes Objective: To develop a model of the psychological factors which predict people’s intention to adopt personalised nutrition. Potential determinants of adoption included perceived risk and benefit, perceived self-efficacy, internal locus of control and health commitment. Methods: A questionnaire, developed from exploratory study data and the existing theoretical literature, and including validated psychological scales was administered to N = 9381 participants from 9 European countries (Germany, Greece, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, the UK, and Norway). Results: Structural equation modelling indicated that the greater participants’ perceived benefits to be associated with personalised nutrition, the more positive their attitudes were towards personalised nutrition, and the greater their intention to adopt it. Higher levels of nutrition self-efficacy were related to more positive attitudes towards, and a greater expressed intention to adopt, personalised nutrition. Other constructs positively impacting attitudes towards personalised nutrition included more positive perceptions of the efficacy of regulatory control to protect consumers (e.g. in relation to personal data protection), higher self-reported internal health locus of control, and health commitment. Although higher perceived risk had a negative relationship with attitude and an inverse relationship with perceived benefit, its effects on attitude and intention to adopt personalised nutrition was less influential than perceived benefit. The model was stable across the different European countries, suggesting that psychological factors determining adoption of personalised nutrition have generic applicability across different European countries. Conclusion: The results suggest that transparent provision of information about potential benefits, and protection of consumers’ personal data is important for adoption, delivery of public health benefits, and commercialisation of personalised nutrition. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement n u 265494 (http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html). Food4Me is the acronym of the project ‘‘Personalised nutrition: an integrated analysis of opportunities and challenges’’ (http://www.food4me.org/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. 2014-12-09T11:56:41Z 2014-12-09T11:56:41Z 2014 Article published version paper Poinhos, R., van der Lans, I.A., Rankin, A., Fischer, A.R.H., Bunting, B., et al. (2014) Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries. PLoS ONE. Vol. 9, Issue 10. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/6721 en http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110614 (c) 2014 Poinhos et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Personalised nutrition
Europe
Consumer attitudes
spellingShingle Personalised nutrition
Europe
Consumer attitudes
Poinhos, R.
van der Lans, I.A.
Rankin, A.
Fischer, A.R.H.
Bunting, B.P.
Kuznesof, S.
Stewart-Knox, Barbara
Frewer, L.J.
Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries
description Yes === Objective: To develop a model of the psychological factors which predict people’s intention to adopt personalised nutrition. Potential determinants of adoption included perceived risk and benefit, perceived self-efficacy, internal locus of control and health commitment. Methods: A questionnaire, developed from exploratory study data and the existing theoretical literature, and including validated psychological scales was administered to N = 9381 participants from 9 European countries (Germany, Greece, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, the UK, and Norway). Results: Structural equation modelling indicated that the greater participants’ perceived benefits to be associated with personalised nutrition, the more positive their attitudes were towards personalised nutrition, and the greater their intention to adopt it. Higher levels of nutrition self-efficacy were related to more positive attitudes towards, and a greater expressed intention to adopt, personalised nutrition. Other constructs positively impacting attitudes towards personalised nutrition included more positive perceptions of the efficacy of regulatory control to protect consumers (e.g. in relation to personal data protection), higher self-reported internal health locus of control, and health commitment. Although higher perceived risk had a negative relationship with attitude and an inverse relationship with perceived benefit, its effects on attitude and intention to adopt personalised nutrition was less influential than perceived benefit. The model was stable across the different European countries, suggesting that psychological factors determining adoption of personalised nutrition have generic applicability across different European countries. Conclusion: The results suggest that transparent provision of information about potential benefits, and protection of consumers’ personal data is important for adoption, delivery of public health benefits, and commercialisation of personalised nutrition. === This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement n u 265494 (http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html). Food4Me is the acronym of the project ‘‘Personalised nutrition: an integrated analysis of opportunities and challenges’’ (http://www.food4me.org/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
author Poinhos, R.
van der Lans, I.A.
Rankin, A.
Fischer, A.R.H.
Bunting, B.P.
Kuznesof, S.
Stewart-Knox, Barbara
Frewer, L.J.
author_facet Poinhos, R.
van der Lans, I.A.
Rankin, A.
Fischer, A.R.H.
Bunting, B.P.
Kuznesof, S.
Stewart-Knox, Barbara
Frewer, L.J.
author_sort Poinhos, R.
title Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries
title_short Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries
title_full Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries
title_fullStr Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries
title_full_unstemmed Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries
title_sort psychological determinants of consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition in 9 european countries
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10454/6721
work_keys_str_mv AT poinhosr psychologicaldeterminantsofconsumeracceptanceofpersonalisednutritionin9europeancountries
AT vanderlansia psychologicaldeterminantsofconsumeracceptanceofpersonalisednutritionin9europeancountries
AT rankina psychologicaldeterminantsofconsumeracceptanceofpersonalisednutritionin9europeancountries
AT fischerarh psychologicaldeterminantsofconsumeracceptanceofpersonalisednutritionin9europeancountries
AT buntingbp psychologicaldeterminantsofconsumeracceptanceofpersonalisednutritionin9europeancountries
AT kuznesofs psychologicaldeterminantsofconsumeracceptanceofpersonalisednutritionin9europeancountries
AT stewartknoxbarbara psychologicaldeterminantsofconsumeracceptanceofpersonalisednutritionin9europeancountries
AT frewerlj psychologicaldeterminantsofconsumeracceptanceofpersonalisednutritionin9europeancountries
_version_ 1719240112819142656