Bone mineral content in laboratory rats following swim and run training

Increased bone density has been observed following physical training. However, it is not known whether the mechanical forces of muscular contraction, gravitational pull, or a combination of these forces are required to cause this adaptation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zierath, Juleen R.
Other Authors: Snyder, Ann C.
Format: Others
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/handle/183191
http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/472942
id ndltd-BSU-oai-cardinalscholar.bsu.edu-handle-183191
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-BSU-oai-cardinalscholar.bsu.edu-handle-1831912014-07-30T03:31:59ZBone mineral content in laboratory rats following swim and run trainingZierath, Juleen R.Exercise -- Physiological aspects.Bones -- Growth.Rats -- Physiology.Increased bone density has been observed following physical training. However, it is not known whether the mechanical forces of muscular contraction, gravitational pull, or a combination of these forces are required to cause this adaptation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine which mechanical force, muscular contraction or gravitational pull, offered the greatest contribution to increased bone mineral content observed following either swim or run training. METHODS: Female Wistar rats were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) Sedentary Control (SC; n = 12), 2) Run Trained (RT; 27.7 m/m, 8% incline, 2 hrs/day; n = 20), and 3) Swim Trained (ST; 2 hrs/day, 2Y/ body weight; n = 14). The animals were sacrificed after 9 weeks of training and the humeri and femurs were removed for analysis.RESULTS: Femur weight, length, diameter, and ponderal index (a measure of robustness), and bone mineral content (BMC) were not different between the three treatment groups. However, femur cortical thickness was significantly (p < 0.01) smaller in the RT when compared to ST and SC rats. The ST humeri were significantly (p < 0.05) heavier, wider, and had a greater BMC when compared with those of the RT and SC rats, while cross sectional area was unaffected by physical training. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the mechanical forces applied by the swim training protocol produced marked bone adaptation in the ST animals following 9 weeks of physical training. Whereas, the combined mechanical and gravitational forces applied during running by the RT rats produced minimal adaptation of bone following 9 weeks of physical training.Snyder, Ann C.2011-06-03T19:34:08Z2011-06-03T19:34:08Z19861986viii, 58 leaves ; 28 cm.LD2489.Z72 1986 .Z54http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/handle/183191http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/472942Virtual Press
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Exercise -- Physiological aspects.
Bones -- Growth.
Rats -- Physiology.
spellingShingle Exercise -- Physiological aspects.
Bones -- Growth.
Rats -- Physiology.
Zierath, Juleen R.
Bone mineral content in laboratory rats following swim and run training
description Increased bone density has been observed following physical training. However, it is not known whether the mechanical forces of muscular contraction, gravitational pull, or a combination of these forces are required to cause this adaptation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine which mechanical force, muscular contraction or gravitational pull, offered the greatest contribution to increased bone mineral content observed following either swim or run training. METHODS: Female Wistar rats were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) Sedentary Control (SC; n = 12), 2) Run Trained (RT; 27.7 m/m, 8% incline, 2 hrs/day; n = 20), and 3) Swim Trained (ST; 2 hrs/day, 2Y/ body weight; n = 14). The animals were sacrificed after 9 weeks of training and the humeri and femurs were removed for analysis.RESULTS: Femur weight, length, diameter, and ponderal index (a measure of robustness), and bone mineral content (BMC) were not different between the three treatment groups. However, femur cortical thickness was significantly (p < 0.01) smaller in the RT when compared to ST and SC rats. The ST humeri were significantly (p < 0.05) heavier, wider, and had a greater BMC when compared with those of the RT and SC rats, while cross sectional area was unaffected by physical training. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the mechanical forces applied by the swim training protocol produced marked bone adaptation in the ST animals following 9 weeks of physical training. Whereas, the combined mechanical and gravitational forces applied during running by the RT rats produced minimal adaptation of bone following 9 weeks of physical training.
author2 Snyder, Ann C.
author_facet Snyder, Ann C.
Zierath, Juleen R.
author Zierath, Juleen R.
author_sort Zierath, Juleen R.
title Bone mineral content in laboratory rats following swim and run training
title_short Bone mineral content in laboratory rats following swim and run training
title_full Bone mineral content in laboratory rats following swim and run training
title_fullStr Bone mineral content in laboratory rats following swim and run training
title_full_unstemmed Bone mineral content in laboratory rats following swim and run training
title_sort bone mineral content in laboratory rats following swim and run training
publishDate 2011
url http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/handle/183191
http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/472942
work_keys_str_mv AT zierathjuleenr bonemineralcontentinlaboratoryratsfollowingswimandruntraining
_version_ 1716709541297520640