臺灣在WTO爭端解決機制下處理兩岸經貿爭端研究

臺灣與中國大陸加入WTO後,其貿易互動將更趨頻繁,此現象除了帶來兩岸經濟的活絡外,也將提高兩岸貿易糾紛發生的可能性,因此熟悉WTO爭端解決機制的運作是臺灣做為一個經貿小國必學的課題;又兩岸糾紛不同於一般國際經貿糾紛,牽涉到敏感的政治因素,臺灣面臨的是對我主權不尊重也不認同之國家,在這樣的情況下,臺灣必須學習如何訴諸WTO爭端解決機制的法律途徑以保障臺灣經貿。 WTO爭端解決機制包含諮商、斡旋等雙邊協商,協商不成則可提請爭端解決機構(DSB)成立爭端解決小組(panel)以為因應,透過小組對兩造意見之書面審查、口頭辯論等意見表達,及蒐集相關資訊蒐集後,最後由小組做成「期中報告」,若成員國無其他...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 陳筱筠, Chen, Hsiao-yun
Language:中文
Published: 國立政治大學
Subjects:
WTO
Online Access:http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0089253010%22.
id ndltd-CHENGCHI-G0089253010
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-CHENGCHI-G00892530102013-01-07T19:27:04Z 臺灣在WTO爭端解決機制下處理兩岸經貿爭端研究 陳筱筠 Chen, Hsiao-yun 爭端解決 世界貿易組織 中國大陸 臺灣 兩岸 dispute settlement WTO mainland China Taiwan cross-strait 臺灣與中國大陸加入WTO後,其貿易互動將更趨頻繁,此現象除了帶來兩岸經濟的活絡外,也將提高兩岸貿易糾紛發生的可能性,因此熟悉WTO爭端解決機制的運作是臺灣做為一個經貿小國必學的課題;又兩岸糾紛不同於一般國際經貿糾紛,牽涉到敏感的政治因素,臺灣面臨的是對我主權不尊重也不認同之國家,在這樣的情況下,臺灣必須學習如何訴諸WTO爭端解決機制的法律途徑以保障臺灣經貿。 WTO爭端解決機制包含諮商、斡旋等雙邊協商,協商不成則可提請爭端解決機構(DSB)成立爭端解決小組(panel)以為因應,透過小組對兩造意見之書面審查、口頭辯論等意見表達,及蒐集相關資訊蒐集後,最後由小組做成「期中報告」,若成員國無其他意見表述,則「期中報告」即為「最終報告」,DSB有權要求被控訴履行裁決。 在整個WTO爭端解決過程中,臺灣必須面臨的挑戰有:中國大陸認定臺灣無提請訴訟資格的主權抗議、國際現實的壓力、龐大的訴訟費用,以及曠日費時的訴訟期間等。倘最後中國拒絕履行義務,臺灣雖可請求DSB授權對中國大陸進行貿易制裁,但其亦將蒙受本身產業在貿易制裁過程中的損失。這些因素使得臺灣政府在對中國大陸發動WTO爭端解決程序時有所顧忌。 但將兩岸爭端訴諸WTO爭端解決程序有一好處,即使兩岸貿易 回歸到規則導向的互動,亦可嚇阻中國大陸不尊重我為WTO會員國之相關行動,使兩岸貿易走向法制化的互動。 After Taiwan and China accession to the WTO, the activities of bilateral trade will be more frequent. Besides the busy business, the possibility of trade disputes between cross-strait parties will be arisen as well. Therefore Taiwan needs to have more intimate knowledge of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. On the other hand, the disputes between cross-strait is different to other international disputes. The opponent that Taiwan faces to is a country which doesn’t respect Taiwan’s state sovereign. In such a circumstances, Taiwan have to learn how to protect the benefits of domestic industries through resorting to the legal access of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. The procedures of WTO dispute settlement mechanism contains bilateral negotiation like consultation、good-offices etc. If the consultation is in vain, the complaining party could request the DSB to establish the panel. The panel has the rights to review the written requests、consider the rebuttal submissions、and seek concerning information, then the panel should issue an “interim report ”.If no other Member State has different requests, the “interim report ”shall be considered “ the final panel report “, and the DSB has the right to ask the defendant party to practice the recommendations. During the whole process of WTO dispute settlement, Taiwan has to face these challenges as follows: the sovereign protest from China、the pressure from international reality、huge expenses of the proceedings, long time in the proceedings etc....If China refuse the recommendations, Taiwan could request the authorization from the DSB to suspend the application to Taiwan concerned of trade sanction. But the sanction will also injury Taiwan’s own domestic industries. Those consideration make Taiwan feel fearful of operating the WTO dispute settlement procedures against China. There is an advantage of resorting to the WTO dispute settlement procedures against China, that is lead the trade activities between cross-strait to the operation of rule-oriented access ,and it also can stop China continue using the measures that will violate Taiwan’s sovereign. Those changes can legalize the trade activities between cross-strait. 國立政治大學 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0089253010%22. text 中文 Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders
collection NDLTD
language 中文
sources NDLTD
topic 爭端解決
世界貿易組織
中國大陸
臺灣
兩岸
dispute settlement
WTO
mainland China
Taiwan
cross-strait
spellingShingle 爭端解決
世界貿易組織
中國大陸
臺灣
兩岸
dispute settlement
WTO
mainland China
Taiwan
cross-strait
陳筱筠
Chen, Hsiao-yun
臺灣在WTO爭端解決機制下處理兩岸經貿爭端研究
description 臺灣與中國大陸加入WTO後,其貿易互動將更趨頻繁,此現象除了帶來兩岸經濟的活絡外,也將提高兩岸貿易糾紛發生的可能性,因此熟悉WTO爭端解決機制的運作是臺灣做為一個經貿小國必學的課題;又兩岸糾紛不同於一般國際經貿糾紛,牽涉到敏感的政治因素,臺灣面臨的是對我主權不尊重也不認同之國家,在這樣的情況下,臺灣必須學習如何訴諸WTO爭端解決機制的法律途徑以保障臺灣經貿。 WTO爭端解決機制包含諮商、斡旋等雙邊協商,協商不成則可提請爭端解決機構(DSB)成立爭端解決小組(panel)以為因應,透過小組對兩造意見之書面審查、口頭辯論等意見表達,及蒐集相關資訊蒐集後,最後由小組做成「期中報告」,若成員國無其他意見表述,則「期中報告」即為「最終報告」,DSB有權要求被控訴履行裁決。 在整個WTO爭端解決過程中,臺灣必須面臨的挑戰有:中國大陸認定臺灣無提請訴訟資格的主權抗議、國際現實的壓力、龐大的訴訟費用,以及曠日費時的訴訟期間等。倘最後中國拒絕履行義務,臺灣雖可請求DSB授權對中國大陸進行貿易制裁,但其亦將蒙受本身產業在貿易制裁過程中的損失。這些因素使得臺灣政府在對中國大陸發動WTO爭端解決程序時有所顧忌。 但將兩岸爭端訴諸WTO爭端解決程序有一好處,即使兩岸貿易 回歸到規則導向的互動,亦可嚇阻中國大陸不尊重我為WTO會員國之相關行動,使兩岸貿易走向法制化的互動。 === After Taiwan and China accession to the WTO, the activities of bilateral trade will be more frequent. Besides the busy business, the possibility of trade disputes between cross-strait parties will be arisen as well. Therefore Taiwan needs to have more intimate knowledge of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. On the other hand, the disputes between cross-strait is different to other international disputes. The opponent that Taiwan faces to is a country which doesn’t respect Taiwan’s state sovereign. In such a circumstances, Taiwan have to learn how to protect the benefits of domestic industries through resorting to the legal access of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. The procedures of WTO dispute settlement mechanism contains bilateral negotiation like consultation、good-offices etc. If the consultation is in vain, the complaining party could request the DSB to establish the panel. The panel has the rights to review the written requests、consider the rebuttal submissions、and seek concerning information, then the panel should issue an “interim report ”.If no other Member State has different requests, the “interim report ”shall be considered “ the final panel report “, and the DSB has the right to ask the defendant party to practice the recommendations. During the whole process of WTO dispute settlement, Taiwan has to face these challenges as follows: the sovereign protest from China、the pressure from international reality、huge expenses of the proceedings, long time in the proceedings etc....If China refuse the recommendations, Taiwan could request the authorization from the DSB to suspend the application to Taiwan concerned of trade sanction. But the sanction will also injury Taiwan’s own domestic industries. Those consideration make Taiwan feel fearful of operating the WTO dispute settlement procedures against China. There is an advantage of resorting to the WTO dispute settlement procedures against China, that is lead the trade activities between cross-strait to the operation of rule-oriented access ,and it also can stop China continue using the measures that will violate Taiwan’s sovereign. Those changes can legalize the trade activities between cross-strait.
author 陳筱筠
Chen, Hsiao-yun
author_facet 陳筱筠
Chen, Hsiao-yun
author_sort 陳筱筠
title 臺灣在WTO爭端解決機制下處理兩岸經貿爭端研究
title_short 臺灣在WTO爭端解決機制下處理兩岸經貿爭端研究
title_full 臺灣在WTO爭端解決機制下處理兩岸經貿爭端研究
title_fullStr 臺灣在WTO爭端解決機制下處理兩岸經貿爭端研究
title_full_unstemmed 臺灣在WTO爭端解決機制下處理兩岸經貿爭端研究
title_sort 臺灣在wto爭端解決機制下處理兩岸經貿爭端研究
publisher 國立政治大學
url http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0089253010%22.
work_keys_str_mv AT chénxiǎoyún táiwānzàiwtozhēngduānjiějuéjīzhìxiàchùlǐliǎngànjīngmàozhēngduānyánjiū
AT chenhsiaoyun táiwānzàiwtozhēngduānjiějuéjīzhìxiàchùlǐliǎngànjīngmàozhēngduānyánjiū
_version_ 1716462081519124480