最高法院涉專利侵權民事訴訟判決之類型化研究

本論文以最高法院涉專利侵權民事訴訟判決為分析對象,而進行類型化的研究。本論文發現此類判決可分為「法律解釋爭議」、「專利爭議中鑑定報告證據力的認定爭議」、「損害賠償請求權或其他請求權基礎之爭議」、以及「特殊問題」等四個類型。而根據此類型化方式,我們可以系統化看待最高法院的判決對專利法發展的影響和貢獻。 === In this thesis, several patent infringement decisions of the Highest Court were analyzed for grouping. The decisions were further grouped by the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 陳秉訓, Chen,Ping-Hsun
Language:中文
Published: 國立政治大學
Subjects:
Online Access:http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0093652002%22.
Description
Summary:本論文以最高法院涉專利侵權民事訴訟判決為分析對象,而進行類型化的研究。本論文發現此類判決可分為「法律解釋爭議」、「專利爭議中鑑定報告證據力的認定爭議」、「損害賠償請求權或其他請求權基礎之爭議」、以及「特殊問題」等四個類型。而根據此類型化方式,我們可以系統化看待最高法院的判決對專利法發展的影響和貢獻。 === In this thesis, several patent infringement decisions of the Highest Court were analyzed for grouping. The decisions were further grouped by the legal issues therein into four types, “question of law,” “evidence of patent infringement analysis,” “cause of action,” and “special issue.” Through the grouping, the effects and contributations of the Highest Court over the patent law can be systematically studied.