開放取用系統與商業資料庫之書目計量比較研究-以諾貝爾生物醫學獎為例
自2003年布達佩斯宣言公佈起,國際間學術文獻開始開放取用的趨勢。於此背景下,本研究以諾貝爾生物醫學獎近十年23位得主為研究樣本,評比在商業資料庫(SCIE、Scopus)及開放取用系統(生物醫學類:Pubmed、Highwire;綜合類:Google Scholar)的文獻收錄狀況,除了比較其內部重複性與完整性,並交叉比對五個資料庫與系統的重複性、獨特性及完整性,同時也觀看能否取得全文的比率,來了解現今開放取用文獻的狀況,進而觀察開放取用系統和商業資料庫兩者是否可以互補,或是開放取用系統有代替商業資料庫的可能性。 研究結果顯示五個資料庫及系統的檢索形式多元。針對作者檢索而言,...
Main Authors: | 潘梓其, Pan, Tzu Chi |
---|---|
Language: | 中文 |
Published: |
國立政治大學
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0100155006%22. |
Similar Items
-
Beyond the Horizon of Exercise Science
by: Changsun Kim
Published: (2020-05-01) -
For Non-expert Clinical Searches, Google Scholar Results are Older with Higher Impact while PubMed Results Offer More Breadth. A Review of: Nourbakhsh, E. F., Nugent, R. F., Wang, H. F., Cevik, C. F., & Nugent, K. (2012). Medical literature searches: A comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 29(3), 214-222.
by: Carol Perryman
Published: (2013-06-01) -
For Non-expert Clinical Searches, Google Scholar Results are Older with Higher Impact while PubMed Results Offer More Breadth
by: Carol Perryman
Published: (2013-06-01) -
Google Scholar Retrieves Twice as Many Relevant Citations as PubMed and Provides Greater Full-Text Access for Quick, Clinical Nephrology Searches
by: Diana K. Wakimoto
Published: (2014-03-01) -
Google Scholar Retrieves Twice as Many Relevant Citations as PubMed and Provides Greater Full-Text Access for Quick, Clinical Nephrology Searches
by: Diana K. Wakimoto
Published: (2014-03-01)