Mutual Interference Between Jets and Intakes in STOVL Aircraft

During wind tunnel testing of jet-lift, short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) aircraft it is usual to simulate the jet efflux but not the intake flows. The intakes, which are commonly faired over or are unpowered, are generally tested in separate wind tunnel experiments. The forces acting on t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saddington, Alistair J.
Other Authors: Knowles, K
Language:en
Published: Department of Aerospace, Power and Sensors 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1826/3895
id ndltd-CRANFIELD1-oai-dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk-1826-3895
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-CRANFIELD1-oai-dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk-1826-38952017-09-05T03:23:41ZMutual Interference Between Jets and Intakes in STOVL AircraftSaddington, Alistair J.Vertically rising aircraftJet-liftSTOVL AircraftWind tunnelsWind tunnel testingDuring wind tunnel testing of jet-lift, short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) aircraft it is usual to simulate the jet efflux but not the intake flows. The intakes, which are commonly faired over or are unpowered, are generally tested in separate wind tunnel experiments. The forces acting on the wind tunnel model are determined by the linear addition of the forces obtained from the two separate tests. There is some doubt as to whether this is a valid approach. A systematic experimental investigation was, therefore, conducted to determine the magnitude of any jet/intake interference effects on a generic jet-lift STOVL aircraft in transitional flight, out of ground effect. Comparisons made between separate and simultaneous jet and intake testing concluded that a mutual jet/intake interference effect does exist. The existence of this interference means that the aerodynamic wing lift loss in transitional flight deduced from isolated jet and intake testing is less than the lift loss obtained from simultaneous jet and intake testing. The experimental research was supplemented by some simplified computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of elements of the flow-field about the aircraft using the k-e turbulence model. The numerical modelling enabled aspects of the flow-field around the aircraft to be visualised which could not easily be done using the experimental apparatus. It is a requirement of the Eng]) programme that part of this thesis must address a management topic linked to the research. In this case the management aspects of wind tunnel project work were examined. A scenario was developed which established a requirement for a large-scale, low-speed wind tunnel with a Reynolds number capability of 20 million. A study was performed on the decision-making process and investment appraisal methods used in the procurement of such a wind tunnel.Department of Aerospace, Power and SensorsKnowles, KMatthews, R G2009-10-28T17:36:52Z2009-10-28T17:36:52Z2009-10-28T17:36:52ZThesis or dissertationDoctoralPhDhttp://hdl.handle.net/1826/3895en
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Vertically rising aircraft
Jet-lift
STOVL Aircraft
Wind tunnels
Wind tunnel testing
spellingShingle Vertically rising aircraft
Jet-lift
STOVL Aircraft
Wind tunnels
Wind tunnel testing
Saddington, Alistair J.
Mutual Interference Between Jets and Intakes in STOVL Aircraft
description During wind tunnel testing of jet-lift, short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) aircraft it is usual to simulate the jet efflux but not the intake flows. The intakes, which are commonly faired over or are unpowered, are generally tested in separate wind tunnel experiments. The forces acting on the wind tunnel model are determined by the linear addition of the forces obtained from the two separate tests. There is some doubt as to whether this is a valid approach. A systematic experimental investigation was, therefore, conducted to determine the magnitude of any jet/intake interference effects on a generic jet-lift STOVL aircraft in transitional flight, out of ground effect. Comparisons made between separate and simultaneous jet and intake testing concluded that a mutual jet/intake interference effect does exist. The existence of this interference means that the aerodynamic wing lift loss in transitional flight deduced from isolated jet and intake testing is less than the lift loss obtained from simultaneous jet and intake testing. The experimental research was supplemented by some simplified computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of elements of the flow-field about the aircraft using the k-e turbulence model. The numerical modelling enabled aspects of the flow-field around the aircraft to be visualised which could not easily be done using the experimental apparatus. It is a requirement of the Eng]) programme that part of this thesis must address a management topic linked to the research. In this case the management aspects of wind tunnel project work were examined. A scenario was developed which established a requirement for a large-scale, low-speed wind tunnel with a Reynolds number capability of 20 million. A study was performed on the decision-making process and investment appraisal methods used in the procurement of such a wind tunnel.
author2 Knowles, K
author_facet Knowles, K
Saddington, Alistair J.
author Saddington, Alistair J.
author_sort Saddington, Alistair J.
title Mutual Interference Between Jets and Intakes in STOVL Aircraft
title_short Mutual Interference Between Jets and Intakes in STOVL Aircraft
title_full Mutual Interference Between Jets and Intakes in STOVL Aircraft
title_fullStr Mutual Interference Between Jets and Intakes in STOVL Aircraft
title_full_unstemmed Mutual Interference Between Jets and Intakes in STOVL Aircraft
title_sort mutual interference between jets and intakes in stovl aircraft
publisher Department of Aerospace, Power and Sensors
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/1826/3895
work_keys_str_mv AT saddingtonalistairj mutualinterferencebetweenjetsandintakesinstovlaircraft
_version_ 1718526091957633024