Selective Core Boosting: The Return of the Turbo Button
Several modern multi-core architectures support the dynamic control of the CPU's clock rate, allowing processor cores to temporarily operate at speeds exceeding the operational base frequency. Conversely, cores can operate at a lower speed or be disabled altogether to save power. Such facilitie...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-127748 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-127748 http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/12774/TR-TUD-FI13-02-Nov-2013b.pdf |
| Summary: | Several modern multi-core architectures support the dynamic control of the CPU's clock rate, allowing processor cores to temporarily operate at speeds exceeding the operational base frequency. Conversely, cores can operate at a lower speed or be disabled altogether to save power. Such facilities are notably provided by Intel's Turbo Boost and AMD's Turbo CORE technologies. Frequency control is typically driven by the operating system which requests changes to the performance state of the processor based on the current load of the system.
In this paper, we investigate the use of dynamic frequency scaling from user space to speed up multi-threaded applications that must occasionally execute time-critical tasks or to solve problems that have heterogeneous computing requirements. We propose a general-purpose library that allows selective control of the frequency of the cores - subject to the limitations of the target architecture. We analyze the performance trade-offs and illustrate its benefits using several benchmarks and real-world workloads when temporarily boosting selected cores executing time-critical operations. While our study primarily focuses on AMD's architecture, we also provide a comparative evaluation of the features, limitations, and runtime overheads of both Turbo Boost and Turbo CORE technologies. Our results show that we can successful exploit these new hardware facilities to
accelerate the execution of key sections of code (critical paths) improving overall performance of some multi-threaded applications. Unlike prior research, we focus on performance instead of power conservation. Our results further can give guidelines for the design of hardware power management facilities and the operating system interfaces to those facilities. |
|---|