Early and late effects of objecthood and spatial frequency on event-related potentials and gamma band activity

• Main Authors: Craddock, Matt, Martinovic, Jasna, Müller, Matthias M.
• Other Authors: Universität Leipzig, Fakultät für Biowissenschaften, Pharmazie und Psychologie
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig 2015
• Subjects: Elektroenzephalografie (EEG); Oszillation; Schwingung; Gamma-Welle; Objekterkennung; Electroencephalography (EEG); Oscillations; Gamma band; Object recognition; ddc:152
• Online Access: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-161492; http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-161492; http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/16149/OAP-2015-027-M%C3%BCller.s12868-015-0144-8.pdf

Background: The visual system may process spatial frequency information in a low-to-high, coarse-to-fine sequence. In particular, low and high spatial frequency information may be processed via different pathways during object recognition, with LSF information projected rapidly to frontal areas and HSF processed later in visual ventral areas. In an electroencephalographic study, we examined the time course of information processing for images filtered to contain different ranges of spatial frequencies. Participants viewed either high spatial frequency (HSF), low spatial frequency (LSF), or unfiltered, broadband (BB) images of objects or nonobject textures, classifying them as showing either man-made or natural objects, or nonobjects. Event-related potentials (ERPs) and evoked and total gamma band activity (eGBA and tGBA) recorded using the electroencephalogram were compared for object and nonobject images across the different spatial frequency ranges. Results: The visual P1 showed independent modulations by object and spatial frequency, while for the N1 these factors interacted. The P1 showed more positive amplitudes for objects than nonobjects, and more positive amplitudes for BB than for HSF images, which in turn evoked more positive amplitudes than LSF images. The peak-to-peak N1 showed that the N1 was much reduced for BB non-objects relative to all other images, while HSF and LSF nonobjects still elicited as negative an N1 as objects. In contrast, eGBA was influenced by spatial frequency and not objecthood, while tGBA showed a stronger response to objects than nonobjects. Conclusions: Different pathways are involved in the processing of low and high spatial frequencies during object recognition, as reflected in interactions between objecthood and spatial frequency in the visual N1 component. Total gamma band seems to be related to a late, probably highlevel representational process.