Drug Addiction and Personal Responsibility

This project examines drug addiction and personal responsibility from the perspective of three different types of theories of addiction: full responsibility, diminished responsibility, and no responsibility. The rational theory of addiction is the fully responsibility theory. The philosophical insig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reagan, Andrew Shawn
Format: Others
Published: Digital Archive @ GSU 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/63
http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1065&context=philosophy_theses
id ndltd-GEORGIA-oai-digitalarchive.gsu.edu-philosophy_theses-1065
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-GEORGIA-oai-digitalarchive.gsu.edu-philosophy_theses-10652013-04-23T03:23:20Z Drug Addiction and Personal Responsibility Reagan, Andrew Shawn This project examines drug addiction and personal responsibility from the perspective of three different types of theories of addiction: full responsibility, diminished responsibility, and no responsibility. The rational theory of addiction is the fully responsibility theory. The philosophical insights by R. Jay Wallace and George Graham are the diminished responsibility theories. Berridge and Robinson’s Incentive Salience theory of drug addiction is the no responsibility theory examined. My conclusion is that diminished responsibility frameworks are the most suitable in a therapeutic context because they are most sensitive to relevant normative aspects. 2009-04-04 text application/pdf http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/63 http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1065&context=philosophy_theses Philosophy Theses Digital Archive @ GSU drug addiction personal responsibility Philosophy
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic drug addiction personal responsibility
Philosophy
spellingShingle drug addiction personal responsibility
Philosophy
Reagan, Andrew Shawn
Drug Addiction and Personal Responsibility
description This project examines drug addiction and personal responsibility from the perspective of three different types of theories of addiction: full responsibility, diminished responsibility, and no responsibility. The rational theory of addiction is the fully responsibility theory. The philosophical insights by R. Jay Wallace and George Graham are the diminished responsibility theories. Berridge and Robinson’s Incentive Salience theory of drug addiction is the no responsibility theory examined. My conclusion is that diminished responsibility frameworks are the most suitable in a therapeutic context because they are most sensitive to relevant normative aspects.
author Reagan, Andrew Shawn
author_facet Reagan, Andrew Shawn
author_sort Reagan, Andrew Shawn
title Drug Addiction and Personal Responsibility
title_short Drug Addiction and Personal Responsibility
title_full Drug Addiction and Personal Responsibility
title_fullStr Drug Addiction and Personal Responsibility
title_full_unstemmed Drug Addiction and Personal Responsibility
title_sort drug addiction and personal responsibility
publisher Digital Archive @ GSU
publishDate 2009
url http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/63
http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1065&context=philosophy_theses
work_keys_str_mv AT reaganandrewshawn drugaddictionandpersonalresponsibility
_version_ 1716584449240465408