| Summary: | Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-08-27T00:10:08Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
VirginiaRegoBezerra_DISSERT.pdf: 1376336 bytes, checksum: c615a8f9b68be29b2e8b1e3aad9729f5 (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-09-01T22:14:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
VirginiaRegoBezerra_DISSERT.pdf: 1376336 bytes, checksum: c615a8f9b68be29b2e8b1e3aad9729f5 (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-01T22:14:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
VirginiaRegoBezerra_DISSERT.pdf: 1376336 bytes, checksum: c615a8f9b68be29b2e8b1e3aad9729f5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-03-14 === O presente trabalho tem como fim abordar o tema da Justi?a Restaurativa como movimento democr?tico-participativo apto a integrar de forma definitiva, a pol?tica criminal e judici?ria nacional. Sua justifica??o reside na necessidade de mudan?a do sistema penal e seus mecanismos processuais, por n?o mais darem respostas eficazes em face do desafio de gerir disputas e neutralizar a viol?ncia. Nesse sentido, seu intento tamb?m foi apresentar o servi?o restaurativo a ser oferecido dentro do Poder Judici?rio, como modelo alternativo ou complementar ? Justi?a Criminal e Juvenil. Para tanto, fez uso da metodologia bibliogr?fica e documental para o levantamento e an?lise qualitativa das fontes consultadas, partindo-se do entendimento de que o Estado Democr?tico Constitucionalevidencia-se como ve?culo transformador do status quo e proporciona a eleva??o da dimens?o do acesso ? justi?a ? qualidade de direito fundamental. Como resultados obtidos, merecem destaque os aspectos referentes ? Justi?a Restaurativa, a exemplo da an?lise de seu conceito, valores, princ?pios vetores, sujeitos afetados pelos lit?gios e suas t?cnicas. Acerca da Justi?a Restaurativa e da Justi?a tradicional, o presente estudo realizou uma discuss?o te?rica com vistas a demonstrar as diferen?as e aproxima??es entre os dois modelos, inclusive examinando a poss?vel conviv?ncia e colabora??o que eles podem manter entre si. Dessa forma, conclui-se pela necessidade de reorganiza??o do sistema de justi?a criminal brasileiro, com base na institucionaliza??o da estrat?gia restaurativa para o segmento da Justi?a Estadual, atrav?s da meta n? 8/2016 do Conselho Nacional de Justi?a (CNJ). Igualmente, discorreu-se sobre os desafios e os riscos da implanta??o desse novo paradigma de pol?tica criminal, tendo como ponto de partida as experi?ncias existentes no Judici?rio brasileiro, atrav?s das t?cnicas de media??o v?tima-ofensor e c?rculos restaurativos, pondo em lugar central a quest?o da pr?pria democratiza??o do Poder Judici?rio. Em conclus?o, resultou s?lida a compreens?o de que ? poss?vel integrar o modelo da Justi?a Restaurativa na pol?tica criminal e judicial do Brasil, muito embora sem substituir o modelo tradicional em vigor, haja vista consistir em uma nova ferramenta para lidar com conflitos, a partir do encontro, da repara??o, da responsabiliza??o, da reintegra??o e da inclus?o como forma de pacifica??o social. === The present study aims to address the restorative justice as a democratic-participative
movement able to integrate definitively the national criminal and judicial justice. Its
justification lies in the change necessity in the penal system and their process mechanisms,
which do not provide efficient answers to the challengers of manage disputes and neutralize
violence. In this sense, the aims of the study was to present the restorative service to be
offered to the judiciary, as an alternative or complementary model to the criminal and juvenile
justice. This study used the bibliographic and documental methodology to analyze
qualitatively the consulted sources. The study assumes that the Constitutional Democratic
state is a transformer mean of the status quo and it see the justice access as a fundamental
right. The results of this study related to the restorative justice include values, principles,
people affected by litigious and their techniques. The present study carried out a theoretical
discussion of the restorative and traditional justice to demonstrate the differences and
similarities between these models, which include the possible collaboration and coexistence
that they could have together. Therefore, this study concludes that it is necessary to reorganize
the criminal justice system in Brazil. This should be done through the institutionalization of
the restorative justice for the state segment using the task number 8/2016 of the National
Counsel of Justice (CNJ). This work also addresses the challengers and risks of the
implementation of this new paradigm of the criminal justice, which has as a starting point the
experiences in the Brazilian judiciary. The work will use the mediation of the technique
victim-offender and will put in place the central question of the democratization of the
judiciary itself. In conclusion, the study resulted in a solid comprehension of what is possible
to integrate in the present-day restorative justice model in the Brazilian criminal and judicial
politics. However, this integration will not replace the present-day traditional model, as the
restorative justice is a new tool to deal with conflicts using the meeting, reparation,
resposabilization, integration and inclusion as a way of social pacification.
|
|---|
