| Summary: | Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:33:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
437423.pdf: 277652 bytes, checksum: 9fbe4da0a3d1a66fbf786bb3fcdbdf53 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011-04-27 === The thesis presents a hypothesis to overcome the current misunderstanding related to the diversity of private law beddings, defending the viability of reconciliation of commutative justice and distributive justice as a way to understand the basis of the legal institutions of private law. The study evaluates the formalist, social functionalist and economic functionalist theories of the private law and detects an element shared by all of them: the theory of justice. The identified central problem results from the gradual loss of the relation between law and the Aristotelian-Thomist theory of justice, gradually operated from the Modern School of Natural Law. The disconnection between justice and law, despite keeping a sporadic relation with the particular justice, determined the eradication of the essential meaning of the general justice of the jusprivatists analyses. The analyzed hypothesis defends that the rescue of general justice, transformed into social justice in modern days by the new order centered in the equal dignity of the human being, materialized through the guarantee of the individual basic capacities, allows us to understand that private law is characterized by horizontal relations of rights and duties between individuals who are rationally understood in terms of particular justice (commutative and distributive), commanded by social justice of equal dignity and recognition and institutionalized by the Constitution and the civil rights. === A tese apresenta uma hip?tese para a supera??o da incompreens?o atual relativa ? diversidade de fundamentos do direito privado, defendendo a viabilidade de compatibiliza??o da justi?a comutativa e da justi?a distributiva como formas de compreens?o das bases dos institutos jur?dicos de direito privado. O trabalho avalia as teorias formalistas, funcionalistas sociais e funcionalistas econ?micas do direito privado e detecta um elemento compartilhado por todas: a teoria da justi?a. O problema central identificado decorre da perda gradativa da rela??o do direito com a teoria da justi?a aristot?lico-tomista operada paulatinamente a partir da Escola Moderna do Direito Natural. A desconex?o entre justi?a e direito, mesmo mantendo uma rela??o espor?dica com a justi?a particular, determinou a erradica??o do sentido essencial da justi?a geral das an?lises jusprivatistas. A hip?tese analisada defende que o resgate da justi?a geral, transformada em justi?a social na modernidade, pela nova ordem centrada na igual dignidade humana, consubstanciada atrav?s da garantia das capacidades humanas b?sicas, permite compreender que o direito privado ? caracterizado por rela??es horizontais de direitos e deveres entre particulares que s?o racionalmente entendidos nos termos da justi?a particular (comutativa e distributiva) ordenada pela justi?a social da igual dignidade e reconhecimento e institucionalizada a partir da Constitui??o e dos direitos fundamentais.
|
|---|
