| Summary: | Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Sociais (csociais-pg@pucrs.br) on 2017-11-01T19:31:06Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
RAFFAELLA _DA_ PORCIUNCULA _PALLAMOLLA_TES.pdf: 2117411 bytes, checksum: 7ee6938c5865643f144c597c09ee168e (MD5) === Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-11-16T16:25:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
RAFFAELLA _DA_ PORCIUNCULA _PALLAMOLLA_TES.pdf: 2117411 bytes, checksum: 7ee6938c5865643f144c597c09ee168e (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-16T16:33:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
RAFFAELLA _DA_ PORCIUNCULA _PALLAMOLLA_TES.pdf: 2117411 bytes, checksum: 7ee6938c5865643f144c597c09ee168e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-08-25 === Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES === The purpose of this research is to analyze the construction of restorative justice in Brazil. It analyzes, initially, the processes of transformation of the modern state, democracy and the criminal justice system. It presents the movement of informalization of justice and its developments, such as community justice and restorative justice, as well as other forms of participation in criminal justice (jury court and victim participation in criminal justice in a broad sense). From this point, presents a proposal to classify the types of participation in criminal justice, based on the purposes of each participation forms. It also draws attention to the fact that the democratic dimension is not always associated with the participation in criminal justice. Subsequently, it analyzes the process of construction of restorative justice in Brazil based on the narratives of the protagonists of this process, the official discourse on restorative justice in Brazil and the most used restorative practices. It presents the trajectory of the protagonists, as well as reconstructs the context of the beginning of the experiences with restorative justice in the country, addressing, besides the pilot projects, the first publications on the subject. It also addresses the current regulation of restorative justice and the process of creation of the Resolution n. 225/2016 from CNJ. Subsequently, it shows that the development of restorative justice in Brazil occurs in two waves, where the role of the judiciary is the characteristic that stands out, although the character of this protagonism does not remain the same. It also analyzes the main characteristics of the Brazilian restorative justice, which involve the protagonism of the judiciary, the hegemony of the discourse of the culture of peace and the pacification of conflicts, associated to the practice of Kay Pranis? restorative circles of Kay Pranis. It argues, finally, that the Brazilian restorative justice has a democratic deficit that seems to be associated with a tendency of Brazilian legal culture, observed not only in previous innovative reforms, but also in forms of participation in traditional criminal justice. === O objeto do presente trabalho ? a constru??o da justi?a restaurativa no Brasil. Para tanto, analisa, inicialmente, os processos de transforma??o do Estado moderno, da democracia e do sistema de justi?a criminal. Apresenta o movimento de informaliza??o da justi?a e seus desdobramentos, a exemplo da justi?a comunit?ria e da justi?a restaurativa, bem como outras formas de participa??o na justi?a criminal (Tribunal do J?ri e participa??o da v?tima na justi?a criminal em sentido amplo). A partir disso, apresenta uma proposta de classifica??o dos tipos de participa??o na justi?a criminal, com base nas finalidades de cada uma das formas de participa??o. Chama a aten??o, tamb?m, para o fato de que nem sempre a dimens?o democr?tica est? associada ? participa??o na justi?a criminal.
Posteriormente, analisa o processo de constru??o da justi?a restaurativa no Brasil com base nas narrativas dos protagonistas desse processo, no discurso oficial sobre a justi?a restaurativa e nas pr?ticas restaurativas mais utilizadas. Apresenta a trajet?ria dos protagonistas e reconstr?i o contexto do in?cio das experi?ncias com justi?a restaurativa no pa?s, abordando, al?m dos projetos-piloto, as primeiras publica??es sobre o tema. Ainda, aborda a atual regulamenta??o da justi?a restaurativa e o processo de elabora??o da Resolu??o CNJ 225/2016. Posteriormente, demonstra que o desenvolvimento da justi?a restaurativa no Brasil ocorre em duas ondas, nas quais o protagonismo do poder judici?rio ? a carater?stica que sobressai, ainda que o car?ter desse protagonismo n?o permane?a o mesmo. Analisa, ainda, as principais caracter?sticas da justi?a restaurativa brasileira, as quais envolvem o protagonismo do judici?rio e a hegemonia do discurso da cultura da paz e da pacifica??o dos conflitos, associados ? pr?tica dos c?rculos restaurativos de Kay Pranis. Argumenta, por fim, que a justi?a restaurativa brasileira possui um d?ficit democr?tico que parece estar associado a uma tend?ncia da cultura jur?dica brasileira, observada n?o s? em reformas legais anteriores pretensamente inovadoras, mas tamb?m em formas de participa??o na justi?a criminal de tipo tradicional.
|
|---|
